Abstract
The May 1992 reform of the CAP included a choice for farmers between set-aside options. This paper examines the question of whether or not this choice feature has exacerbated the slippage problem associated with the set-aside policy in the context of heterogeneous land quality. A model is developed which provides a basis for determining both a farmer's preferred choice of set-aside option, and the implications of this choice for output reduction. A numerical application of the model suggests a strong tendency for farmers to choose the less effective option in terms of reducing output.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 255-260 |
| Journal | Journal of Agricultural Economics |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |