Laboratory versus field testing in cricket bowling: A review of current and past practice in modelling techniques

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In cricket bowling, the reconstruction of elbow angle data is of utmost importance to the bowling versus throwing argument. This paper reviews system and modelling errors inherent in three-dimensional reconstruction processes with respect to the elbow extension tolerance set by the International Cricket Council. An understanding of these factors will enable more informed decisions about the choice of infield versus laboratory testing in the calculation of elbow extension during bowling in cricket. Although there is a paucity of objective data related to in-field and laboratory testing, biomechanists must be guided by the greater accuracy of opto-reflective than video-based systems and so testing, at least for the present, should be conducted in a laboratory setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-108
JournalSports Biomechanics
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laboratory versus field testing in cricket bowling: A review of current and past practice in modelling techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this