TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge co-production for Indigenous adaptation pathways
T2 - Transform post-colonial articulation complexes to empower local decision-making
AU - Central Land Council
AU - Hill, Rosemary
AU - Walsh, Fiona J.
AU - Davies, Jocelyn
AU - Sparrow, Ashley
AU - Mooney, Meg
AU - Wise, Russell M.
AU - Tengö, Maria
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a partnership between the CSIRO Land and Water Flagship and Ninti One Ltd., working in collaboration with the Central Land Council Ltyentye Apurte (Santa Teresa) Rangers and the Tangentyere Council Aboriginal Corporation Land and Learning Program. Financial support for the research was also provided through the National Environmental Science Program’s Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub. We would like to acknowledge the continuing long-term financial support of the Indigenous Land Corporation that makes the Ltyentye Apurte Rangers’ work possible. The Central Land Council Land Management section provided invaluable additional support to our work. We would like to acknowledge and thank the Eastern Arrernte Traditional Owners and Elders for the opportunity to work together on their traditional lands, and for their fine contributions to the project. We acknowledge the assistance of reviewers for their incisive comments on earlier drafts. Coauthors, Walsh, Davies and Sparrow were affiliated with CSIRO at the time of the research, and coauthor Moonee with Tangentyere Council Aboriginal Corporation Land and Learning Program. The research was conducted under ethics approval 81/13 from the CSIRO Social Science Human Research Ethics Committee and 13/183 from the Central Australian Human Research Ethics Committee.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by a partnership between the CSIRO Land and Water Flagship and Ninti One Ltd. working in collaboration with the Central Land Council Ltyentye Apurte (Santa Teresa) Rangers and the Tangentyere Council Aboriginal Corporation Land and Learning Program. Financial support for the research was also provided through the National Environmental Science Program's Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub. We would like to acknowledge the continuing long-term financial support of the Indigenous Land Corporation that makes the Ltyentye Apurte Rangers? work possible. The Central Land Council Land Management section provided invaluable additional support to our work. We would like to acknowledge and thank the Eastern Arrernte Traditional Owners and Elders for the opportunity to work together on their traditional lands, and for their fine contributions to the project. We acknowledge the assistance of reviewers for their incisive comments on earlier drafts. Coauthors, Walsh, Davies and Sparrow were affiliated with CSIRO at the time of the research, and coauthor Moonee with Tangentyere Council Aboriginal Corporation Land and Learning Program. The research was conducted under ethics approval 81/13 from the CSIRO Social Science Human Research Ethics Committee and 13/183 from the Central Australian Human Research Ethics Committee.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Co-production between scientific and Indigenous knowledge has been identified as useful to generating adaptation pathways with Indigenous peoples, who are attached to their traditional lands and thus highly exposed to the impacts of climate change. However, ignoring the complex and contested histories of nation-state colonisation can result in naïve adaptation plans that increase vulnerability. Here, through a case study in central Australia, we investigate the conditions under which co-production between scientific and Indigenous knowledge can support climate change adaptation pathways among place-attached Indigenous communities. A research team including scientists, Ltyentye Apurte Rangers and other staff from the Central Land Council first undertook activities to co-produce climate change presentations in the local Arrernte language; enable community members to identify potential adaptation actions; and implement one action, erosion control. Second, we reflected on the outcomes of these activities in order to unpack deeper influences. Applying the theory of articulation complexes, we show how ideologies, institutions and economies have linked Indigenous societies and the establishing Australian nation-state since colonisation. The sequence of complexes characterised as frontier, mission, pastoral, land-rights, community-development and re-centralisation, which is current, have both enabled and constrained adaptation options. We found knowledge co-production generates adaptation pathways when: (1) effective methods for knowledge co-production are used, based on deeply respectful partnerships, cultural governance and working together through five co-production tasks—prepare, communicate, discuss, bring together and apply; (2) Indigenous people have ongoing connection to their traditional territories to maintain their Indigenous knowledge; (3) the relationship between the Indigenous people and the nation-state empowers local decision-making and learning, which requires and creates consent, trust, accountability, reciprocity, and resurgence of Indigenous culture, knowledge and practices. These conditions foster the emergence of articulation complexes that enable the necessary transformative change from the colonial legacies. Both these conditions and our approach are likely to be relevant for place-attached Indigenous peoples across the globe in generating climate adaptation pathways.
AB - Co-production between scientific and Indigenous knowledge has been identified as useful to generating adaptation pathways with Indigenous peoples, who are attached to their traditional lands and thus highly exposed to the impacts of climate change. However, ignoring the complex and contested histories of nation-state colonisation can result in naïve adaptation plans that increase vulnerability. Here, through a case study in central Australia, we investigate the conditions under which co-production between scientific and Indigenous knowledge can support climate change adaptation pathways among place-attached Indigenous communities. A research team including scientists, Ltyentye Apurte Rangers and other staff from the Central Land Council first undertook activities to co-produce climate change presentations in the local Arrernte language; enable community members to identify potential adaptation actions; and implement one action, erosion control. Second, we reflected on the outcomes of these activities in order to unpack deeper influences. Applying the theory of articulation complexes, we show how ideologies, institutions and economies have linked Indigenous societies and the establishing Australian nation-state since colonisation. The sequence of complexes characterised as frontier, mission, pastoral, land-rights, community-development and re-centralisation, which is current, have both enabled and constrained adaptation options. We found knowledge co-production generates adaptation pathways when: (1) effective methods for knowledge co-production are used, based on deeply respectful partnerships, cultural governance and working together through five co-production tasks—prepare, communicate, discuss, bring together and apply; (2) Indigenous people have ongoing connection to their traditional territories to maintain their Indigenous knowledge; (3) the relationship between the Indigenous people and the nation-state empowers local decision-making and learning, which requires and creates consent, trust, accountability, reciprocity, and resurgence of Indigenous culture, knowledge and practices. These conditions foster the emergence of articulation complexes that enable the necessary transformative change from the colonial legacies. Both these conditions and our approach are likely to be relevant for place-attached Indigenous peoples across the globe in generating climate adaptation pathways.
KW - Articulation complex
KW - Path generation
KW - Resilience
KW - Social-ecological systems
KW - Transformations
KW - Vulnerability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85093681854
U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102161
DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102161
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-3780
VL - 65
JO - Global Environmental Change
JF - Global Environmental Change
M1 - 102161
ER -