Justice Update – Myanmar hit for six at the ICJ

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle in specialist publication


The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ruled that Myanmar must protect the Muslim Rohingya community. Gambia had accused Myanmar of violating the Genocide Convention and had asked for ‘provisional measures’ to prevent any more harm being done.

Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar’s de facto leader, was in the court last month to deny allegations that in 2017 the army had systematically burned Rohingya villages, murdered and raped thousands and forced more than 700,000 of the victims to flee to neighbouring Bangladesh.

The Gambia had asked the court to order Myanmar’s government to protect the Rohingya from violence, instruct the army to cease its persecution, preserve all evidence related to the allegations of genocide and submit a report to the court on the measures taken to comply with its orders within four months.

The 17 judges unanimously agreed to most of Gambia’s requests—even Claus Kreß, the German judge appointed by Myanmar.

We got international lawyer Priya Pillai – one of the architects of the new Asia Justice Coalition that has taken up this issue and Melanie O’Brien – from University Western Australia Law School – to tell us their favourite bits and explain a bit more.
Original languageEnglish
Specialist publicationAsymmetrical Haircuts (International Justice Podcast)
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jan 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Justice Update – Myanmar hit for six at the ICJ'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this