Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes

R. Mccloy; D. Randall; Stephan Schug; H. Kehlet; C. Simanski; F. Bonnet; F. Camu; B. Fischer; G. Joshi; N. Rawal; E.A.M. Neugebauer

doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes

R. Mccloy, D. Randall, Stephan Schug, H. Kehlet, C. Simanski, F. Bonnet, F. Camu, B. Fischer, G. Joshi, N. Rawal, E.A.M. Neugebauer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background : In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2541-2553
Journal	Surgical Endoscopy
Volume	22
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1
Publication status	Published - 2008

Access to Document

10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

Cite this

Mccloy, R., Randall, D., Schug, S., Kehlet, H., Simanski, C., Bonnet, F., Camu, F., Fischer, B., Joshi, G., Rawal, N., & Neugebauer, E. A. M. (2008). Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy, 22(12), 2541-2553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

@article{3f8cdfb178c34910814b71ad5208a150,

title = "Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes",

abstract = "Background : In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision",

author = "R. Mccloy and D. Randall and Stephan Schug and H. Kehlet and C. Simanski and F. Bonnet and F. Camu and B. Fischer and G. Joshi and N. Rawal and E.A.M. Neugebauer",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

pages = "2541--2553",

journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",

issn = "0930-2794",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "12",

}

Mccloy, R, Randall, D, Schug, S, Kehlet, H, Simanski, C, Bonnet, F, Camu, F, Fischer, B, Joshi, G, Rawal, N & Neugebauer, EAM 2008, 'Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes', Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2541-2553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes

AU - Mccloy, R.

AU - Randall, D.

AU - Schug, Stephan

AU - Kehlet, H.

AU - Simanski, C.

AU - Bonnet, F.

AU - Camu, F.

AU - Fischer, B.

AU - Joshi, G.

AU - Rawal, N.

AU - Neugebauer, E.A.M.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Background : In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision

AB - Background : In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

DO - 10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 18810546

VL - 22

SP - 2541

EP - 2553

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 12

ER -

Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this