Is sexual selection defined by dimorphism alone? A reply to Padian and Horner

R.J. Knell, D. Naish, Joseph Tomkins, D.W.E. Hone

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter

12 Citations (Web of Science)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	250-251
Journal	Trends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume	28
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.007
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

@article{e0ccf99ca3b74f5580f03afdc1b00922,

title = "Is sexual selection defined by dimorphism alone? A reply to Padian and Horner",

author = "R.J. Knell and D. Naish and Joseph Tomkins and D.W.E. Hone",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.007",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "250--251",

journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is sexual selection defined by dimorphism alone? A reply to Padian and Horner

AU - Knell, R.J.

AU - Naish, D.

AU - Tomkins, Joseph

AU - Hone, D.W.E.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.007

M3 - Letter

VL - 28

SP - 250

EP - 251

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

IS - 5

ER -