Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment

C. Gemell, John P. Sykes, Allan Trench

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperConference paper

Abstract

The perceived and actual impact of government mineral policy upon the government share from gold mining revenues is assessed for ten key countries in which the gold sector is of relevance in advancing economic growth. Five African and five South American jurisdictions are considered, namely Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, South Africa and Tanzania from Africa; and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guyana and Peru in South America.

Both the headline corporate income tax rate and royalty level are identified as poor indicators for the total government share. In addition, significant differences between industry perception and actual government tax levels are identified by this study. The quantitative financial analysis shows that there is no clear relationship between individual taxation rates, taken in isolation, and the overall average effective tax rate (AETR) paid by the project over its life. Neither companies nor governments should use individual taxation rates, or industry perceptions, in isolation to assess the overall competitiveness or equity of a country’s minerals taxation regime – such analysis can be very misleading.

In this study, the perceived impact is determined from the well-established Fraser Institute survey published each year, and in 2014 compared 122 minerals jurisdictions globally. The actual impact is determined from quantitative modelling of the financial performance of a hypothetical gold mining project in each country. The technical parameters of the project are held constant; instead the differing mineral policies in each jurisdiction are applied to determine the resultant impact upon the relative share of the economic rents delivered to both private and public sectors. In the quantitative analysis, the total government share varies from 36.3 per cent in South Africa to 66.5 per cent in Ghana.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Mine Management 2016:
Subtitle of host publicationA Strategic Approach to Global Industry Challenges
EditorsPaul Harper
PublisherAustralian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM)
Pages227-238
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)978 1 925100 48 8
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventInternational Mine Management 2016: A Strategic Approach to Global Industry Challenges - Brisbane, Australia, Brisbane , Australia
Duration: 22 Aug 201624 Aug 2016

Conference

ConferenceInternational Mine Management 2016
CountryAustralia
CityBrisbane
Period22/08/1624/08/16

Fingerprint

Government
Jurisdiction
Fiscal
Attractiveness
Gold mining
Taxation
Ghana
Industry
Minerals
South Africa
Isolation
Mineral policy
Africa
Economic growth
Quantitative analysis
Equity
Modeling
Peru
Tax
Colombia

Cite this

Gemell, C., Sykes, J. P., & Trench, A. (2016). Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment. In P. Harper (Ed.), International Mine Management 2016: A Strategic Approach to Global Industry Challenges (pp. 227-238). Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM).
Gemell, C. ; Sykes, John P. ; Trench, Allan. / Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment. International Mine Management 2016: A Strategic Approach to Global Industry Challenges. editor / Paul Harper. Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM), 2016. pp. 227-238
@inproceedings{b41e52342dbc40dca0450f6242a5e1ee,
title = "Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment",
abstract = "The perceived and actual impact of government mineral policy upon the government share from gold mining revenues is assessed for ten key countries in which the gold sector is of relevance in advancing economic growth. Five African and five South American jurisdictions are considered, namely Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, South Africa and Tanzania from Africa; and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guyana and Peru in South America.Both the headline corporate income tax rate and royalty level are identified as poor indicators for the total government share. In addition, significant differences between industry perception and actual government tax levels are identified by this study. The quantitative financial analysis shows that there is no clear relationship between individual taxation rates, taken in isolation, and the overall average effective tax rate (AETR) paid by the project over its life. Neither companies nor governments should use individual taxation rates, or industry perceptions, in isolation to assess the overall competitiveness or equity of a country’s minerals taxation regime – such analysis can be very misleading.In this study, the perceived impact is determined from the well-established Fraser Institute survey published each year, and in 2014 compared 122 minerals jurisdictions globally. The actual impact is determined from quantitative modelling of the financial performance of a hypothetical gold mining project in each country. The technical parameters of the project are held constant; instead the differing mineral policies in each jurisdiction are applied to determine the resultant impact upon the relative share of the economic rents delivered to both private and public sectors. In the quantitative analysis, the total government share varies from 36.3 per cent in South Africa to 66.5 per cent in Ghana.",
author = "C. Gemell and Sykes, {John P.} and Allan Trench",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "978 1 925100 48 8",
pages = "227--238",
editor = "Paul Harper",
booktitle = "International Mine Management 2016:",
publisher = "Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM)",

}

Gemell, C, Sykes, JP & Trench, A 2016, Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment. in P Harper (ed.), International Mine Management 2016: A Strategic Approach to Global Industry Challenges. Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM), pp. 227-238, International Mine Management 2016, Brisbane , Australia, 22/08/16.

Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment. / Gemell, C.; Sykes, John P.; Trench, Allan.

International Mine Management 2016: A Strategic Approach to Global Industry Challenges. ed. / Paul Harper. Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM), 2016. p. 227-238.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperConference paper

TY - GEN

T1 - Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment

AU - Gemell, C.

AU - Sykes, John P.

AU - Trench, Allan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The perceived and actual impact of government mineral policy upon the government share from gold mining revenues is assessed for ten key countries in which the gold sector is of relevance in advancing economic growth. Five African and five South American jurisdictions are considered, namely Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, South Africa and Tanzania from Africa; and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guyana and Peru in South America.Both the headline corporate income tax rate and royalty level are identified as poor indicators for the total government share. In addition, significant differences between industry perception and actual government tax levels are identified by this study. The quantitative financial analysis shows that there is no clear relationship between individual taxation rates, taken in isolation, and the overall average effective tax rate (AETR) paid by the project over its life. Neither companies nor governments should use individual taxation rates, or industry perceptions, in isolation to assess the overall competitiveness or equity of a country’s minerals taxation regime – such analysis can be very misleading.In this study, the perceived impact is determined from the well-established Fraser Institute survey published each year, and in 2014 compared 122 minerals jurisdictions globally. The actual impact is determined from quantitative modelling of the financial performance of a hypothetical gold mining project in each country. The technical parameters of the project are held constant; instead the differing mineral policies in each jurisdiction are applied to determine the resultant impact upon the relative share of the economic rents delivered to both private and public sectors. In the quantitative analysis, the total government share varies from 36.3 per cent in South Africa to 66.5 per cent in Ghana.

AB - The perceived and actual impact of government mineral policy upon the government share from gold mining revenues is assessed for ten key countries in which the gold sector is of relevance in advancing economic growth. Five African and five South American jurisdictions are considered, namely Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, South Africa and Tanzania from Africa; and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guyana and Peru in South America.Both the headline corporate income tax rate and royalty level are identified as poor indicators for the total government share. In addition, significant differences between industry perception and actual government tax levels are identified by this study. The quantitative financial analysis shows that there is no clear relationship between individual taxation rates, taken in isolation, and the overall average effective tax rate (AETR) paid by the project over its life. Neither companies nor governments should use individual taxation rates, or industry perceptions, in isolation to assess the overall competitiveness or equity of a country’s minerals taxation regime – such analysis can be very misleading.In this study, the perceived impact is determined from the well-established Fraser Institute survey published each year, and in 2014 compared 122 minerals jurisdictions globally. The actual impact is determined from quantitative modelling of the financial performance of a hypothetical gold mining project in each country. The technical parameters of the project are held constant; instead the differing mineral policies in each jurisdiction are applied to determine the resultant impact upon the relative share of the economic rents delivered to both private and public sectors. In the quantitative analysis, the total government share varies from 36.3 per cent in South Africa to 66.5 per cent in Ghana.

UR - https://www.ausimm.com.au/publications/epublication.aspx?ID=17023

M3 - Conference paper

SN - 978 1 925100 48 8

SP - 227

EP - 238

BT - International Mine Management 2016:

A2 - Harper, Paul

PB - Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM)

ER -

Gemell C, Sykes JP, Trench A. Is Perception Reality? Evaluating the Fiscal Attractiveness of International Jurisdictions for Gold Mining Investment. In Harper P, editor, International Mine Management 2016: A Strategic Approach to Global Industry Challenges. Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM). 2016. p. 227-238