Is Peer Review a Good Idea?

Remco Heesen, Liam Kofi Bright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Prepublication peer review should be abolished. We consider the effects that such a change will have on the social structure of science, paying particular attention to the changed incentive structure and the likely effects on the behaviour of individual scientists. We evaluate these changes from the perspective of epistemic consequentialism. We find that where the effects of abolishing prepublication peer review can be evaluated with a reasonable level of confidence based on presently available evidence, they are either positive or neutral. We conclude that on present evidence abolishing peer review weakly dominates the status quo.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 May 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Is Peer Review a Good Idea?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this