Investigating the effects of inhibition training on attentional bias change: A simple Bayesian approach

Sandersan Onie, Lies Notebaert, Patrick Clarke, Steven B. Most

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Attention bias modification (ABM), in which participants are trained to direct attention away from negative information, has been shown to reduce anxiety. However, such findings have been inconsistent. Changes in attentional bias are often absent, suggesting need for further investigation of the underlying mechanisms of ABM, as well as better statistical methods to analyze ABM data in order to reduce inferential error. In this study, we (a) compared inhibition control training to standard ABM training conditions, and (b) demonstrated the benefits of using simple Bayesian analyses to analyze ABM data. We recruited 116 participants and assessed their attentional bias prior to and after training, which involved practice avoiding negative stimuli, attending to negative stimuli, or avoiding a non-emotional, exogenous attentional cue (inhibitory control training). Our results suggested no impact of any of the training conditions on attentional bias. We further demonstrate Bayesian analyses may help control for both Type I and Type II error relative to a frequentist approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2782
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Issue numberJanuary
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Bayes Theorem
Cues
Inhibition (Psychology)
Attentional Bias
Anxiety

Cite this

@article{fb4d0b4a1ffd43d7b20deed034b4226c,
title = "Investigating the effects of inhibition training on attentional bias change: A simple Bayesian approach",
abstract = "Attention bias modification (ABM), in which participants are trained to direct attention away from negative information, has been shown to reduce anxiety. However, such findings have been inconsistent. Changes in attentional bias are often absent, suggesting need for further investigation of the underlying mechanisms of ABM, as well as better statistical methods to analyze ABM data in order to reduce inferential error. In this study, we (a) compared inhibition control training to standard ABM training conditions, and (b) demonstrated the benefits of using simple Bayesian analyses to analyze ABM data. We recruited 116 participants and assessed their attentional bias prior to and after training, which involved practice avoiding negative stimuli, attending to negative stimuli, or avoiding a non-emotional, exogenous attentional cue (inhibitory control training). Our results suggested no impact of any of the training conditions on attentional bias. We further demonstrate Bayesian analyses may help control for both Type I and Type II error relative to a frequentist approach.",
keywords = "Attention bias modification, Attentional bias, Bayesian statistics, Dot probe, Inhibition control",
author = "Sandersan Onie and Lies Notebaert and Patrick Clarke and Most, {Steven B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02782",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",
number = "January",

}

Investigating the effects of inhibition training on attentional bias change : A simple Bayesian approach. / Onie, Sandersan; Notebaert, Lies; Clarke, Patrick; Most, Steven B.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, No. January, 2782, 21.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating the effects of inhibition training on attentional bias change

T2 - A simple Bayesian approach

AU - Onie, Sandersan

AU - Notebaert, Lies

AU - Clarke, Patrick

AU - Most, Steven B.

PY - 2019/1/21

Y1 - 2019/1/21

N2 - Attention bias modification (ABM), in which participants are trained to direct attention away from negative information, has been shown to reduce anxiety. However, such findings have been inconsistent. Changes in attentional bias are often absent, suggesting need for further investigation of the underlying mechanisms of ABM, as well as better statistical methods to analyze ABM data in order to reduce inferential error. In this study, we (a) compared inhibition control training to standard ABM training conditions, and (b) demonstrated the benefits of using simple Bayesian analyses to analyze ABM data. We recruited 116 participants and assessed their attentional bias prior to and after training, which involved practice avoiding negative stimuli, attending to negative stimuli, or avoiding a non-emotional, exogenous attentional cue (inhibitory control training). Our results suggested no impact of any of the training conditions on attentional bias. We further demonstrate Bayesian analyses may help control for both Type I and Type II error relative to a frequentist approach.

AB - Attention bias modification (ABM), in which participants are trained to direct attention away from negative information, has been shown to reduce anxiety. However, such findings have been inconsistent. Changes in attentional bias are often absent, suggesting need for further investigation of the underlying mechanisms of ABM, as well as better statistical methods to analyze ABM data in order to reduce inferential error. In this study, we (a) compared inhibition control training to standard ABM training conditions, and (b) demonstrated the benefits of using simple Bayesian analyses to analyze ABM data. We recruited 116 participants and assessed their attentional bias prior to and after training, which involved practice avoiding negative stimuli, attending to negative stimuli, or avoiding a non-emotional, exogenous attentional cue (inhibitory control training). Our results suggested no impact of any of the training conditions on attentional bias. We further demonstrate Bayesian analyses may help control for both Type I and Type II error relative to a frequentist approach.

KW - Attention bias modification

KW - Attentional bias

KW - Bayesian statistics

KW - Dot probe

KW - Inhibition control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060270560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02782

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02782

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - January

M1 - 2782

ER -