Inversion of geological knowledge for fold geometry

Lachlan Grose, Laurent Ailleres, Gautier Laurent, Robin Armit, Mark Jessell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The process of building three-dimensional (3D) geological models can be framed as an inverse problem where a model describing the 3D distribution of rock units is non-uniquely derived from geological observations. The inverse problem theory provides a powerful framework for inferring these parameters from all geological observations, in a similar way to how a geologist can iteratively update their structural interpretation while mapping. Existing geological knowledge is usually indirectly incorporated into 3D models using the geologist's non-unique interpretation as form lines, cross sections and level maps. These approaches treat constraints derived from geological knowledge in the same way as direct observations, diluting and confusing both information provided by geological knowledge and hard data resulting in significant subjectivity. We present a geological inversion using Bayesian inference where geological knowledge can be incorporated directly into the interpolation scheme with likelihood functions and informative prior distributions. We demonstrate these approaches on a series of synthetic fold shapes as a proof of concept and a case study from the Proterozoic Davenport Province in the Northern Territory, Australia. The combined inversion of geological data and knowledge significantly reduces the uncertainty in possible fold geometries where data is sparse or highly ambiguous. This could be used by geologists while mapping to propagate information about uncertainties throughout the mapping/model building process and would allow for different structural interpretations to be rapidly tested for targeted data collection.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-14
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Structural Geology
    Volume119
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

    Fingerprint

    fold
    geometry
    inverse problem
    interpolation
    Proterozoic
    cross section
    inversion
    rock
    distribution
    parameter
    province

    Cite this

    Grose, Lachlan ; Ailleres, Laurent ; Laurent, Gautier ; Armit, Robin ; Jessell, Mark. / Inversion of geological knowledge for fold geometry. In: Journal of Structural Geology. 2019 ; Vol. 119. pp. 1-14.
    @article{df858bf1bb3a46d7bb46bad8287fca46,
    title = "Inversion of geological knowledge for fold geometry",
    abstract = "The process of building three-dimensional (3D) geological models can be framed as an inverse problem where a model describing the 3D distribution of rock units is non-uniquely derived from geological observations. The inverse problem theory provides a powerful framework for inferring these parameters from all geological observations, in a similar way to how a geologist can iteratively update their structural interpretation while mapping. Existing geological knowledge is usually indirectly incorporated into 3D models using the geologist's non-unique interpretation as form lines, cross sections and level maps. These approaches treat constraints derived from geological knowledge in the same way as direct observations, diluting and confusing both information provided by geological knowledge and hard data resulting in significant subjectivity. We present a geological inversion using Bayesian inference where geological knowledge can be incorporated directly into the interpolation scheme with likelihood functions and informative prior distributions. We demonstrate these approaches on a series of synthetic fold shapes as a proof of concept and a case study from the Proterozoic Davenport Province in the Northern Territory, Australia. The combined inversion of geological data and knowledge significantly reduces the uncertainty in possible fold geometries where data is sparse or highly ambiguous. This could be used by geologists while mapping to propagate information about uncertainties throughout the mapping/model building process and would allow for different structural interpretations to be rapidly tested for targeted data collection.",
    keywords = "3D modeling, Bayesian inference, Folding, Geological inversion, Geological uncertainty, Inverse problem, Structural geology",
    author = "Lachlan Grose and Laurent Ailleres and Gautier Laurent and Robin Armit and Mark Jessell",
    year = "2019",
    month = "2",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jsg.2018.11.010",
    language = "English",
    volume = "119",
    pages = "1--14",
    journal = "Journal of Structural Geology",
    issn = "0191-8141",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Inversion of geological knowledge for fold geometry. / Grose, Lachlan; Ailleres, Laurent; Laurent, Gautier; Armit, Robin; Jessell, Mark.

    In: Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 119, 01.02.2019, p. 1-14.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Inversion of geological knowledge for fold geometry

    AU - Grose, Lachlan

    AU - Ailleres, Laurent

    AU - Laurent, Gautier

    AU - Armit, Robin

    AU - Jessell, Mark

    PY - 2019/2/1

    Y1 - 2019/2/1

    N2 - The process of building three-dimensional (3D) geological models can be framed as an inverse problem where a model describing the 3D distribution of rock units is non-uniquely derived from geological observations. The inverse problem theory provides a powerful framework for inferring these parameters from all geological observations, in a similar way to how a geologist can iteratively update their structural interpretation while mapping. Existing geological knowledge is usually indirectly incorporated into 3D models using the geologist's non-unique interpretation as form lines, cross sections and level maps. These approaches treat constraints derived from geological knowledge in the same way as direct observations, diluting and confusing both information provided by geological knowledge and hard data resulting in significant subjectivity. We present a geological inversion using Bayesian inference where geological knowledge can be incorporated directly into the interpolation scheme with likelihood functions and informative prior distributions. We demonstrate these approaches on a series of synthetic fold shapes as a proof of concept and a case study from the Proterozoic Davenport Province in the Northern Territory, Australia. The combined inversion of geological data and knowledge significantly reduces the uncertainty in possible fold geometries where data is sparse or highly ambiguous. This could be used by geologists while mapping to propagate information about uncertainties throughout the mapping/model building process and would allow for different structural interpretations to be rapidly tested for targeted data collection.

    AB - The process of building three-dimensional (3D) geological models can be framed as an inverse problem where a model describing the 3D distribution of rock units is non-uniquely derived from geological observations. The inverse problem theory provides a powerful framework for inferring these parameters from all geological observations, in a similar way to how a geologist can iteratively update their structural interpretation while mapping. Existing geological knowledge is usually indirectly incorporated into 3D models using the geologist's non-unique interpretation as form lines, cross sections and level maps. These approaches treat constraints derived from geological knowledge in the same way as direct observations, diluting and confusing both information provided by geological knowledge and hard data resulting in significant subjectivity. We present a geological inversion using Bayesian inference where geological knowledge can be incorporated directly into the interpolation scheme with likelihood functions and informative prior distributions. We demonstrate these approaches on a series of synthetic fold shapes as a proof of concept and a case study from the Proterozoic Davenport Province in the Northern Territory, Australia. The combined inversion of geological data and knowledge significantly reduces the uncertainty in possible fold geometries where data is sparse or highly ambiguous. This could be used by geologists while mapping to propagate information about uncertainties throughout the mapping/model building process and would allow for different structural interpretations to be rapidly tested for targeted data collection.

    KW - 3D modeling

    KW - Bayesian inference

    KW - Folding

    KW - Geological inversion

    KW - Geological uncertainty

    KW - Inverse problem

    KW - Structural geology

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057545371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.11.010

    DO - 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.11.010

    M3 - Article

    VL - 119

    SP - 1

    EP - 14

    JO - Journal of Structural Geology

    JF - Journal of Structural Geology

    SN - 0191-8141

    ER -