Introduction-Literature on screen: A synoptic view

Deborah Cartmell, Imelda Whelehan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The publication of The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen confirms the fact that Literature on Screen has finally arrived. Always a “hybrid” subject, literature on screen was too literary for film studies and too film-based for Literary Studies, and has tended to occupy an uneasy place between the two, perhaps tending towards departments of literature in the main. Literary adaptations have been the subject of much academic discourse in both fields (auteur studies, and Shakespeare on Screen texts are two obvious examples), but until the last decade there have been few attempts to evaluate the process of adaptation itself and even then only some of these investigations attempt to theorize the textual transactions that occur in the process-whether in the mind of the adaptor, the critic, or the reader/viewer. As early as 1936, Renaissance scholar Allardyce Nicoll, in Theatre and Film, considers the potential of film to merit the same status as theatrical texts, while conversely reflecting on how film fails to achieve its potential when it simply copies, or “culls” from literature.1 Like Nicoll, George Bluestone in 1957, in the first book-length study of adaptation, Novels into Film, alludes to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing’s essay The Laocoon (1766), on the differentiations between poetry and painting.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages1-12
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781139001441
ISBN (Print)9780521849623
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Poetry
Film Studies
Viewer
Literary Studies
Academic Discourse
Length
Novel
Merit
Literary Adaptations
William Shakespeare
Laocoon
Reader
Auteur

Cite this

Cartmell, D., & Whelehan, I. (2007). Introduction-Literature on screen: A synoptic view. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen (pp. 1-12). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849624.001
Cartmell, Deborah ; Whelehan, Imelda. / Introduction-Literature on screen : A synoptic view. The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 1-12
@inbook{dcc1bd7f78ab4a3ab4659e0bc2b03f5b,
title = "Introduction-Literature on screen: A synoptic view",
abstract = "The publication of The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen confirms the fact that Literature on Screen has finally arrived. Always a “hybrid” subject, literature on screen was too literary for film studies and too film-based for Literary Studies, and has tended to occupy an uneasy place between the two, perhaps tending towards departments of literature in the main. Literary adaptations have been the subject of much academic discourse in both fields (auteur studies, and Shakespeare on Screen texts are two obvious examples), but until the last decade there have been few attempts to evaluate the process of adaptation itself and even then only some of these investigations attempt to theorize the textual transactions that occur in the process-whether in the mind of the adaptor, the critic, or the reader/viewer. As early as 1936, Renaissance scholar Allardyce Nicoll, in Theatre and Film, considers the potential of film to merit the same status as theatrical texts, while conversely reflecting on how film fails to achieve its potential when it simply copies, or “culls” from literature.1 Like Nicoll, George Bluestone in 1957, in the first book-length study of adaptation, Novels into Film, alludes to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing’s essay The Laocoon (1766), on the differentiations between poetry and painting.",
author = "Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CCOL0521849624.001",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780521849623",
pages = "1--12",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Cartmell, D & Whelehan, I 2007, Introduction-Literature on screen: A synoptic view. in The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849624.001

Introduction-Literature on screen : A synoptic view. / Cartmell, Deborah; Whelehan, Imelda.

The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 1-12.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction-Literature on screen

T2 - A synoptic view

AU - Cartmell, Deborah

AU - Whelehan, Imelda

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - The publication of The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen confirms the fact that Literature on Screen has finally arrived. Always a “hybrid” subject, literature on screen was too literary for film studies and too film-based for Literary Studies, and has tended to occupy an uneasy place between the two, perhaps tending towards departments of literature in the main. Literary adaptations have been the subject of much academic discourse in both fields (auteur studies, and Shakespeare on Screen texts are two obvious examples), but until the last decade there have been few attempts to evaluate the process of adaptation itself and even then only some of these investigations attempt to theorize the textual transactions that occur in the process-whether in the mind of the adaptor, the critic, or the reader/viewer. As early as 1936, Renaissance scholar Allardyce Nicoll, in Theatre and Film, considers the potential of film to merit the same status as theatrical texts, while conversely reflecting on how film fails to achieve its potential when it simply copies, or “culls” from literature.1 Like Nicoll, George Bluestone in 1957, in the first book-length study of adaptation, Novels into Film, alludes to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing’s essay The Laocoon (1766), on the differentiations between poetry and painting.

AB - The publication of The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen confirms the fact that Literature on Screen has finally arrived. Always a “hybrid” subject, literature on screen was too literary for film studies and too film-based for Literary Studies, and has tended to occupy an uneasy place between the two, perhaps tending towards departments of literature in the main. Literary adaptations have been the subject of much academic discourse in both fields (auteur studies, and Shakespeare on Screen texts are two obvious examples), but until the last decade there have been few attempts to evaluate the process of adaptation itself and even then only some of these investigations attempt to theorize the textual transactions that occur in the process-whether in the mind of the adaptor, the critic, or the reader/viewer. As early as 1936, Renaissance scholar Allardyce Nicoll, in Theatre and Film, considers the potential of film to merit the same status as theatrical texts, while conversely reflecting on how film fails to achieve its potential when it simply copies, or “culls” from literature.1 Like Nicoll, George Bluestone in 1957, in the first book-length study of adaptation, Novels into Film, alludes to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing’s essay The Laocoon (1766), on the differentiations between poetry and painting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894130453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CCOL0521849624.001

DO - 10.1017/CCOL0521849624.001

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521849623

SP - 1

EP - 12

BT - The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Cartmell D, Whelehan I. Introduction-Literature on screen: A synoptic view. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849624.001