Intervening to Enhance Proactivity in Organizations: Improving the Present or Changing the Future

Karoline Strauss, Sharon Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing body of evidence has linked proactivity at work to positive outcomes. Yet little research to date has investigated whether employees’ proactive behavior in organizations can be facilitated through training and development. Nor has research considered which variables shape employees’ responses to such interventions. We investigate the effects on proactivity of two theoretically distinct training and development interventions in a randomized field experiment with police officers and police support staff (N = 112). We hypothesized that a problem-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and the ideal present more salient, would lead to increases in individual task proactivity, whereas a vision-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and an ideal future more salient, would increase organization member proactivity. Intervention effects were moderated by role overload and future orientation, respectively. Only individuals with high levels of role overload increased their individual task proactivity as a result of the problem-focused intervention, and only individuals high in future orientation increased their organization member proactivity as a result of the vision-focused intervention. Our study integrates different cybernetic perspectives on how proactivity is motivated and provides novel insights into moderators of interventions designed to capture these different mechanisms. From a practical perspective, our study supports organizations seeking to implement training and development interventions and helps them to determine who might benefit most from interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1250-1278
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Management
Volume44
Issue number3
Early online date9 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Proactivity
Training and development
Future orientation
Discrepancy
Status quo
Police
Employees
Role overload
Moderator
Proactive behavior
Cybernetics
Staff
Field experiment

Cite this

@article{f6da45fa6a3c48f4a50b32a79b28eab7,
title = "Intervening to Enhance Proactivity in Organizations: Improving the Present or Changing the Future",
abstract = "A growing body of evidence has linked proactivity at work to positive outcomes. Yet little research to date has investigated whether employees’ proactive behavior in organizations can be facilitated through training and development. Nor has research considered which variables shape employees’ responses to such interventions. We investigate the effects on proactivity of two theoretically distinct training and development interventions in a randomized field experiment with police officers and police support staff (N = 112). We hypothesized that a problem-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and the ideal present more salient, would lead to increases in individual task proactivity, whereas a vision-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and an ideal future more salient, would increase organization member proactivity. Intervention effects were moderated by role overload and future orientation, respectively. Only individuals with high levels of role overload increased their individual task proactivity as a result of the problem-focused intervention, and only individuals high in future orientation increased their organization member proactivity as a result of the vision-focused intervention. Our study integrates different cybernetic perspectives on how proactivity is motivated and provides novel insights into moderators of interventions designed to capture these different mechanisms. From a practical perspective, our study supports organizations seeking to implement training and development interventions and helps them to determine who might benefit most from interventions.",
author = "Karoline Strauss and Sharon Parker",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206315602531",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1250--1278",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Intervening to Enhance Proactivity in Organizations : Improving the Present or Changing the Future. / Strauss, Karoline; Parker, Sharon.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 1250-1278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intervening to Enhance Proactivity in Organizations

T2 - Improving the Present or Changing the Future

AU - Strauss, Karoline

AU - Parker, Sharon

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - A growing body of evidence has linked proactivity at work to positive outcomes. Yet little research to date has investigated whether employees’ proactive behavior in organizations can be facilitated through training and development. Nor has research considered which variables shape employees’ responses to such interventions. We investigate the effects on proactivity of two theoretically distinct training and development interventions in a randomized field experiment with police officers and police support staff (N = 112). We hypothesized that a problem-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and the ideal present more salient, would lead to increases in individual task proactivity, whereas a vision-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and an ideal future more salient, would increase organization member proactivity. Intervention effects were moderated by role overload and future orientation, respectively. Only individuals with high levels of role overload increased their individual task proactivity as a result of the problem-focused intervention, and only individuals high in future orientation increased their organization member proactivity as a result of the vision-focused intervention. Our study integrates different cybernetic perspectives on how proactivity is motivated and provides novel insights into moderators of interventions designed to capture these different mechanisms. From a practical perspective, our study supports organizations seeking to implement training and development interventions and helps them to determine who might benefit most from interventions.

AB - A growing body of evidence has linked proactivity at work to positive outcomes. Yet little research to date has investigated whether employees’ proactive behavior in organizations can be facilitated through training and development. Nor has research considered which variables shape employees’ responses to such interventions. We investigate the effects on proactivity of two theoretically distinct training and development interventions in a randomized field experiment with police officers and police support staff (N = 112). We hypothesized that a problem-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and the ideal present more salient, would lead to increases in individual task proactivity, whereas a vision-focused intervention, which made discrepancies between the status quo and an ideal future more salient, would increase organization member proactivity. Intervention effects were moderated by role overload and future orientation, respectively. Only individuals with high levels of role overload increased their individual task proactivity as a result of the problem-focused intervention, and only individuals high in future orientation increased their organization member proactivity as a result of the vision-focused intervention. Our study integrates different cybernetic perspectives on how proactivity is motivated and provides novel insights into moderators of interventions designed to capture these different mechanisms. From a practical perspective, our study supports organizations seeking to implement training and development interventions and helps them to determine who might benefit most from interventions.

U2 - 10.1177/0149206315602531

DO - 10.1177/0149206315602531

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1250

EP - 1278

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 3

ER -