Interrogating Incoherence and Prospects for a Trans-Positive Psychiatry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The core of Vincent and Jane’s Interrogating Incongruence is critical of the appeal to the concept of incongruence in DSM-5 and ICD-11 characterisations of trans people, a critique taken to be ground-clearing for more trans-positive, psychiatrically-infused medical interventions. I concur with Vincent and Jane’s ultimate goals but depart from the view developed in the paper on two fronts. The first is that I remain sceptical about the overall prospects for truly trans-positive psychiatry. Trans should follow homosexuality and other categories of sexual orientation that have been abandoned rather than reformed as constituents of psychiatric diagnosis and categorisation. The second is that I think that the authors’ central criticisms of the appeal to incongruence are misplaced.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralasian Philosophical Review
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interrogating Incoherence and Prospects for a Trans-Positive Psychiatry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this