TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights and recommendations into service model structure, staff roles and qualifications in a UK cancer specific clinical exercise service
T2 - a multi-method qualitative study
AU - Crozier, Anthony
AU - Watson, Paula M.
AU - Graves, Lee E.
AU - George, Keith P.
AU - Richardson, David
AU - Naylor, Louise
AU - Green, Daniel J.
AU - Rosenberg, Michael
AU - Jones, Helen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: Clinical exercise delivery in the United Kingdom is disparate in terms of service structure, staff roles and qualifications, therefore it is difficult to evaluate and compare across services. Our aim was to explore, in a purposely selected cancer exercise service that was recognised as effective; (i) how staff knowledge, skills and competencies contribute to the provision of the service, (ii) how these components assist in creating effective services, and (iii) to identify existing challenges from staff and service user perspectives. Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as an overarching guide to review the Prehab4Cancer service. Exercise specialists and service user perspectives were explored using a multi-method approach (online semi-structured interviews, online focus group and in-person observation) and data triangulation. Results: Exercise specialists were educated to a minimum of undergraduate degree level with extensive cancer-specific knowledge and skills, equivalent to that of a Registration Council for Exercise Physiologist (RCCP) Clinical Exercise Physiologist. Workplace experience was essential for exercise specialist development in behaviour change and communications skills. Conclusions: Staff should be educated to a level comparable with the standards for registered RCCP Clinical Exercise Physiologists, which includes workplace experience to develop knowledge, skills and competencies in real-world settings.
AB - Purpose: Clinical exercise delivery in the United Kingdom is disparate in terms of service structure, staff roles and qualifications, therefore it is difficult to evaluate and compare across services. Our aim was to explore, in a purposely selected cancer exercise service that was recognised as effective; (i) how staff knowledge, skills and competencies contribute to the provision of the service, (ii) how these components assist in creating effective services, and (iii) to identify existing challenges from staff and service user perspectives. Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as an overarching guide to review the Prehab4Cancer service. Exercise specialists and service user perspectives were explored using a multi-method approach (online semi-structured interviews, online focus group and in-person observation) and data triangulation. Results: Exercise specialists were educated to a minimum of undergraduate degree level with extensive cancer-specific knowledge and skills, equivalent to that of a Registration Council for Exercise Physiologist (RCCP) Clinical Exercise Physiologist. Workplace experience was essential for exercise specialist development in behaviour change and communications skills. Conclusions: Staff should be educated to a level comparable with the standards for registered RCCP Clinical Exercise Physiologists, which includes workplace experience to develop knowledge, skills and competencies in real-world settings.
KW - cancer exercise provision
KW - Exercise knowledge
KW - skills and competencies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164128510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2023.2225879
DO - 10.1080/09638288.2023.2225879
M3 - Article
C2 - 37341512
AN - SCOPUS:85164128510
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 46
SP - 2535
EP - 2547
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 12
ER -