Influences on participation in a community-based colorectal neoplasia screening program by virtual colonoscopy in Australia

G.M. Forbes, Lin Fritschi, R.M. Mendelson, N.M. Foster, J.T. Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of certain personal and health behaviour characteristics on participation in a community-based colorectal neoplasia (CRN) screening program using virtual colonoscopy.Methods: The study population comprised randomly selected subjects from the State electoral roll; screening by virtual colonoscopy was offered through letter of invitation. For non-responders, a further invitation was sent a month later. Non-response after a further month led to subjects being considered non-participants. Non-participants were contacted by letter to complete a structured questionnaire; participants completed a similar questionnaire immediately after their screening virtual colonoscopy.Results: Discussing the invitation to screening with someone else increased the likelihood of participation by 63% (prevalence ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.38-1.93); knowing someone with cancer increased the likelihood of participation by 23% (PR 1.23, 95% CI 1.07-1.42). Among participants who discussed screening with another individual, the spouse was the most common (71%). Subjects who were single were less likely to participate (PR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.94). The strongest reported influence for participation was information provided in the letter of invitation (29.8%). The most common reasons for non-participation were lack of time and perceived good health.Conclusions and Implications: This study suggests that a simple strategy to facilitate participation is to encourage subjects to discuss screening with others; further, to recognise that this may be most difficult for those who are single. Information provided to subjects prior to screening positively contributes to participation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-287
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

Cite this