TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorporating Psychological Science into Policy Making
T2 - The Case of Misinformation
AU - Kozyreva, Anastasia
AU - Smillie, Laura
AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan
N1 - Funding Information:
The article was written as part of a Volkswagen Foundation grant to S. Lewandowsky (Initiative “Artificial Intelligence and the Society of the Future”). S. Lewandowsky also acknowledges financial support from the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant 101020961 PRODEMINFO) and the Humboldt Foundation through a research award.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Hogrefe Publishing.
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - The spread of false and misleading information in online social networks is a global problem in need of urgent solutions. It is also a policy problem because misinformation can harm both the public and democracies. To address the spread of misinformation, policymakers require a successful interface between science and policy, as well as a range of evidence-based solutions that respect fundamental rights while efficiently mitigating the harms of misinformation online. In this article, we discuss how regulatory and nonregulatory instruments can be informed by scientific research and used to reach EU policy objectives. First, we consider what it means to approach misinformation as a policy problem. We then outline four building blocks for cooperation between scientists and policymakers who wish to address the problem of misinformation: understanding the misinformation problem, understanding the psychological drivers and public perceptions of misinformation, finding evidence-based solutions, and co-developing appropriate policy measures. Finally, through the lens of psychological science, we examine policy instruments that have been proposed in the EU, focusing on the strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation 2022.
AB - The spread of false and misleading information in online social networks is a global problem in need of urgent solutions. It is also a policy problem because misinformation can harm both the public and democracies. To address the spread of misinformation, policymakers require a successful interface between science and policy, as well as a range of evidence-based solutions that respect fundamental rights while efficiently mitigating the harms of misinformation online. In this article, we discuss how regulatory and nonregulatory instruments can be informed by scientific research and used to reach EU policy objectives. First, we consider what it means to approach misinformation as a policy problem. We then outline four building blocks for cooperation between scientists and policymakers who wish to address the problem of misinformation: understanding the misinformation problem, understanding the psychological drivers and public perceptions of misinformation, finding evidence-based solutions, and co-developing appropriate policy measures. Finally, through the lens of psychological science, we examine policy instruments that have been proposed in the EU, focusing on the strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation 2022.
KW - disinformation
KW - harmful content
KW - misinformation
KW - policy making
KW - regulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165494288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000493
DO - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000493
M3 - Article
C2 - 37994309
AN - SCOPUS:85165494288
SN - 1016-9040
VL - 28
SP - 206
EP - 224
JO - European Psychologist
JF - European Psychologist
IS - 3
ER -