Incorporating geography into a new generalized theoretical and statistical framework addressing the modifiable areal unit problem

M Tuson, M Yap, M R Kok, K Murray, B Turlach, D Whyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND: All analyses of spatially aggregated data are vulnerable to the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP), which describes the sensitivity of analytical results to the arbitrary choice of spatial aggregation unit at which data are measured. The MAUP is a serious problem endemic to analyses of spatially aggregated data in all scientific disciplines. However, the impact of the MAUP is rarely considered, perhaps partly because it is still widely considered to be unsolvable.

RESULTS: It was originally understood that a solution to the MAUP should constitute a comprehensive statistical framework describing the regularities in estimates of association observed at different combinations of spatial scale and zonation. Additionally, it has been debated how such a solution should incorporate the geographical characteristics of areal units (e.g. shape, size, and configuration), and in particular whether this can be achieved in a purely mathematical framework (i.e. independent of areal units). We argue that the consideration of areal units must form part of a solution to the MAUP, since the MAUP only manifests in their presence. Thus, we present a theoretical and statistical framework that incorporates the characteristics of areal units by combining estimates obtained from different scales and zonations. We show that associations estimated at scales larger than a minimal geographical unit of analysis are systematically biased from a true minimal-level effect, with different zonations generating uniquely biased estimates. Therefore, it is fundamentally erroneous to infer conclusions based on data that are spatially aggregated beyond the minimal level. Instead, researchers should measure and display information, estimate effects, and infer conclusions at the smallest possible meaningful geographical scale. The framework we develop facilitates this.

CONCLUSIONS: The proposed framework represents a new minimum standard in the estimation of associations using spatially aggregated data, and a reference point against which previous findings and misconceptions related to the MAUP can be understood.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Health Geographics
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 27 Mar 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Incorporating geography into a new generalized theoretical and statistical framework addressing the modifiable areal unit problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this