Incapacity, Non est Factum and Unjust Enrichment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent NSW Court of Appeal decision - nature of enrichment - restitutionary liability of a borrower lacking mental capacity at the time of entering into a loan agreement - relationship between pleas of non est factum and incapacity - analysis - implications of findings of incapacity and non est factum for the issue of enrichment - implications of decision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-390
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume33
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Incapacity, Non est Factum and Unjust Enrichment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this