Incapacity, Non est Factum and Unjust Enrichment

Elise Bant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent NSW Court of Appeal decision - nature of enrichment - restitutionary liability of a borrower lacking mental capacity at the time of entering into a loan agreement - relationship between pleas of non est factum and incapacity - analysis - implications of findings of incapacity and non est factum for the issue of enrichment - implications of decision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-390
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume33
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

liability
loan
appeal
time

Cite this

Bant, Elise. / Incapacity, Non est Factum and Unjust Enrichment. In: Melbourne University Law Review. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 368-390.
@article{61fefc35d2474931b3aa747c5033f331,
title = "Incapacity, Non est Factum and Unjust Enrichment",
abstract = "Recent NSW Court of Appeal decision - nature of enrichment - restitutionary liability of a borrower lacking mental capacity at the time of entering into a loan agreement - relationship between pleas of non est factum and incapacity - analysis - implications of findings of incapacity and non est factum for the issue of enrichment - implications of decision.",
author = "Elise Bant",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "368--390",
journal = "Melbourne University Law Review",
issn = "0025-8938",
publisher = "Melbourne University Law Review",
number = "2",

}

Incapacity, Non est Factum and Unjust Enrichment. / Bant, Elise.

In: Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2009, p. 368-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incapacity, Non est Factum and Unjust Enrichment

AU - Bant, Elise

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Recent NSW Court of Appeal decision - nature of enrichment - restitutionary liability of a borrower lacking mental capacity at the time of entering into a loan agreement - relationship between pleas of non est factum and incapacity - analysis - implications of findings of incapacity and non est factum for the issue of enrichment - implications of decision.

AB - Recent NSW Court of Appeal decision - nature of enrichment - restitutionary liability of a borrower lacking mental capacity at the time of entering into a loan agreement - relationship between pleas of non est factum and incapacity - analysis - implications of findings of incapacity and non est factum for the issue of enrichment - implications of decision.

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 368

EP - 390

JO - Melbourne University Law Review

JF - Melbourne University Law Review

SN - 0025-8938

IS - 2

ER -