In situ SHRIMP U-Pb dating of monazite integrated with petrology and textures: Does bulk composition control whether monazite forms in low-Ca pelitic rocks during amphibolite facies metamorphism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bulk composition and specific reaction history among common silicate minerals have been proposed as controls on monazite growth in metapelitic rocks during amphibolite facies metamorphism. It has also been implied that monazite that formed during greenschist facies metamorphism may be preserved unchanged under upper amphibolite facies conditions. If correct, this would make the interpretation of monazite ages in polymetamorphic rocks exceedingly difficult, because isotopic dates could vary significantly in rocks that have experienced identical metamorphic conditions but differ only slightly in whole-rock composition. Low-Ca pelitic schists from the Mount Barren Group in southwestern Australia display a range of whole-rock compositions in AFM space and different peak mineral assemblages resulting from amphibolite facies metamorphism (similar to 8 kb, 650 degrees C). In this study, we test whether bulk composition controls the formation of monazite through geochronology and textural evidence linking monazite growth with deformation and peak metamorphism. X-ray element mapping of monazite from the metapelitic rocks reveals concentric zoning in many grains with distinct cores and rims. In situ SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of monazite yields two Pb-207/Pb-206 age populations. The cores, and texturally early monazite, give an age of 1209 +/- 10 Ma, interpreted to record prograde metamorphism, whereas the rims and "late" monazite define a single population of 1186 +/- 16 Ma, which is considered the likely age of peak thermal metamorphism. The growth monazite was widespread in low-Ca pelitic schists representing a broad range of compositions in AFM space, indicating that variations in bulk composition in AFM space did not control the formation of monazite during amphibolite facies metamorphism in the Mount Barren Group. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3040-3058
JournalGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Volume70
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Geochronology
Petrology
monazite
amphibolite facies
petrology
metamorphism
Textures
texture
Rocks
Chemical analysis
rock
geochronology
schist
dating
in situ
Silicate minerals
prograde metamorphism
Zoning
silicate mineral
greenschist facies

Cite this

@article{c92df64c472045828cd8fddb51c41a6b,
title = "In situ SHRIMP U-Pb dating of monazite integrated with petrology and textures: Does bulk composition control whether monazite forms in low-Ca pelitic rocks during amphibolite facies metamorphism",
abstract = "Bulk composition and specific reaction history among common silicate minerals have been proposed as controls on monazite growth in metapelitic rocks during amphibolite facies metamorphism. It has also been implied that monazite that formed during greenschist facies metamorphism may be preserved unchanged under upper amphibolite facies conditions. If correct, this would make the interpretation of monazite ages in polymetamorphic rocks exceedingly difficult, because isotopic dates could vary significantly in rocks that have experienced identical metamorphic conditions but differ only slightly in whole-rock composition. Low-Ca pelitic schists from the Mount Barren Group in southwestern Australia display a range of whole-rock compositions in AFM space and different peak mineral assemblages resulting from amphibolite facies metamorphism (similar to 8 kb, 650 degrees C). In this study, we test whether bulk composition controls the formation of monazite through geochronology and textural evidence linking monazite growth with deformation and peak metamorphism. X-ray element mapping of monazite from the metapelitic rocks reveals concentric zoning in many grains with distinct cores and rims. In situ SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of monazite yields two Pb-207/Pb-206 age populations. The cores, and texturally early monazite, give an age of 1209 +/- 10 Ma, interpreted to record prograde metamorphism, whereas the rims and {"}late{"} monazite define a single population of 1186 +/- 16 Ma, which is considered the likely age of peak thermal metamorphism. The growth monazite was widespread in low-Ca pelitic schists representing a broad range of compositions in AFM space, indicating that variations in bulk composition in AFM space did not control the formation of monazite during amphibolite facies metamorphism in the Mount Barren Group. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
author = "Birger Rasmussen and Janet Muhling and I.R. Fletcher and Michael Wingate",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.gca.2006.03.025",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "3040--3058",
journal = "Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta",
issn = "0016-7037",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In situ SHRIMP U-Pb dating of monazite integrated with petrology and textures: Does bulk composition control whether monazite forms in low-Ca pelitic rocks during amphibolite facies metamorphism

AU - Rasmussen, Birger

AU - Muhling, Janet

AU - Fletcher, I.R.

AU - Wingate, Michael

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Bulk composition and specific reaction history among common silicate minerals have been proposed as controls on monazite growth in metapelitic rocks during amphibolite facies metamorphism. It has also been implied that monazite that formed during greenschist facies metamorphism may be preserved unchanged under upper amphibolite facies conditions. If correct, this would make the interpretation of monazite ages in polymetamorphic rocks exceedingly difficult, because isotopic dates could vary significantly in rocks that have experienced identical metamorphic conditions but differ only slightly in whole-rock composition. Low-Ca pelitic schists from the Mount Barren Group in southwestern Australia display a range of whole-rock compositions in AFM space and different peak mineral assemblages resulting from amphibolite facies metamorphism (similar to 8 kb, 650 degrees C). In this study, we test whether bulk composition controls the formation of monazite through geochronology and textural evidence linking monazite growth with deformation and peak metamorphism. X-ray element mapping of monazite from the metapelitic rocks reveals concentric zoning in many grains with distinct cores and rims. In situ SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of monazite yields two Pb-207/Pb-206 age populations. The cores, and texturally early monazite, give an age of 1209 +/- 10 Ma, interpreted to record prograde metamorphism, whereas the rims and "late" monazite define a single population of 1186 +/- 16 Ma, which is considered the likely age of peak thermal metamorphism. The growth monazite was widespread in low-Ca pelitic schists representing a broad range of compositions in AFM space, indicating that variations in bulk composition in AFM space did not control the formation of monazite during amphibolite facies metamorphism in the Mount Barren Group. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Bulk composition and specific reaction history among common silicate minerals have been proposed as controls on monazite growth in metapelitic rocks during amphibolite facies metamorphism. It has also been implied that monazite that formed during greenschist facies metamorphism may be preserved unchanged under upper amphibolite facies conditions. If correct, this would make the interpretation of monazite ages in polymetamorphic rocks exceedingly difficult, because isotopic dates could vary significantly in rocks that have experienced identical metamorphic conditions but differ only slightly in whole-rock composition. Low-Ca pelitic schists from the Mount Barren Group in southwestern Australia display a range of whole-rock compositions in AFM space and different peak mineral assemblages resulting from amphibolite facies metamorphism (similar to 8 kb, 650 degrees C). In this study, we test whether bulk composition controls the formation of monazite through geochronology and textural evidence linking monazite growth with deformation and peak metamorphism. X-ray element mapping of monazite from the metapelitic rocks reveals concentric zoning in many grains with distinct cores and rims. In situ SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of monazite yields two Pb-207/Pb-206 age populations. The cores, and texturally early monazite, give an age of 1209 +/- 10 Ma, interpreted to record prograde metamorphism, whereas the rims and "late" monazite define a single population of 1186 +/- 16 Ma, which is considered the likely age of peak thermal metamorphism. The growth monazite was widespread in low-Ca pelitic schists representing a broad range of compositions in AFM space, indicating that variations in bulk composition in AFM space did not control the formation of monazite during amphibolite facies metamorphism in the Mount Barren Group. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.gca.2006.03.025

DO - 10.1016/j.gca.2006.03.025

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 3040

EP - 3058

JO - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

JF - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

SN - 0016-7037

IS - 12

ER -