TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving interpreting for dementia assessments: Results from the MINDSET trial
AU - Brijnath, Bianca
AU - Cavuoto, Marina G.
AU - Markusevska, Simona
AU - Gilbert, Andrew
AU - Antoniades, Josefine
AU - Garcia, Erika Gonzalez
AU - Hlavac, Jim
AU - Low, Lee Fay
AU - LoGiudice, Dina
AU - Woodward-Kron, Robyn
AU - Enticott, Joanne
AU - Hwang, Kerry
AU - White, Jennifer
AU - Lin, Xiaoping
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: The Improving Interpreting for Dementia Assessments (MINDSET) study aimed to upskill interpreters through an online co-designed course in dementia and cognitive assessments. METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled digital trial conducted between June 2022 and November 2023. Interpreters were randomized to training or waitlist control conditions with 3- and 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome was a composite Z-score comprising dementia and cross-cultural knowledge, translation and ethical knowledge, and observed interpreting skills. Preliminary analyses were conducted using a mixed ANOVA with assessment period as the within-subjects factor and intervention group as the between-subjects factor, controlling for age. RESULTS: 126 interpreters (Mage = 44.13 years (SD = 12.71) completed baseline (22 Arabic, 14 Cantonese, 6 Greek, 14 Italian, 64 Mandarin, 6 Vietnamese), 3m follow-up (n = 100) and 6m follow-up (n = 101). For the primary outcome, there were no significant main effects for assessment period F (2, 178) = 0.21, p = .814 nor intervention group F (1, 89) = 0.31, p = .548, and no significant interaction between intervention group and assessment period, F (2, 178) = 0.64, p = .526. Secondary outcomes revealed significant main effects for dementia knowledge (DKAS) for the assessment period, F (2, 98) = 8.80, p <.001, and intervention group F (1, 99) = 4.59, p = .035, with significantly higher scores at the 3- (mean difference = 1.308, SE = .31, p <.001, 95% CI .692, 1.924) and 6-month follow-up (mean difference = .814, SE = .31, p = .010, 95% CI .203, 1.425); and significantly higher scores in the intervention compared to control (mean difference = .842, SE = .393, p = .035, 95% CI .062, 1.621). A significant interaction between assessment period and intervention group F (2, 98) = 3.33, p = .040 indicated that the increase in scores at the 3- and 6-month periods were greater for the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time a dementia training resource for interpreters has been trialled. Preliminary analyses revealed an improvement in interpreter's dementia knowledge.
AB - BACKGROUND: The Improving Interpreting for Dementia Assessments (MINDSET) study aimed to upskill interpreters through an online co-designed course in dementia and cognitive assessments. METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled digital trial conducted between June 2022 and November 2023. Interpreters were randomized to training or waitlist control conditions with 3- and 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome was a composite Z-score comprising dementia and cross-cultural knowledge, translation and ethical knowledge, and observed interpreting skills. Preliminary analyses were conducted using a mixed ANOVA with assessment period as the within-subjects factor and intervention group as the between-subjects factor, controlling for age. RESULTS: 126 interpreters (Mage = 44.13 years (SD = 12.71) completed baseline (22 Arabic, 14 Cantonese, 6 Greek, 14 Italian, 64 Mandarin, 6 Vietnamese), 3m follow-up (n = 100) and 6m follow-up (n = 101). For the primary outcome, there were no significant main effects for assessment period F (2, 178) = 0.21, p = .814 nor intervention group F (1, 89) = 0.31, p = .548, and no significant interaction between intervention group and assessment period, F (2, 178) = 0.64, p = .526. Secondary outcomes revealed significant main effects for dementia knowledge (DKAS) for the assessment period, F (2, 98) = 8.80, p <.001, and intervention group F (1, 99) = 4.59, p = .035, with significantly higher scores at the 3- (mean difference = 1.308, SE = .31, p <.001, 95% CI .692, 1.924) and 6-month follow-up (mean difference = .814, SE = .31, p = .010, 95% CI .203, 1.425); and significantly higher scores in the intervention compared to control (mean difference = .842, SE = .393, p = .035, 95% CI .062, 1.621). A significant interaction between assessment period and intervention group F (2, 98) = 3.33, p = .040 indicated that the increase in scores at the 3- and 6-month periods were greater for the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time a dementia training resource for interpreters has been trialled. Preliminary analyses revealed an improvement in interpreter's dementia knowledge.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214483680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/alz.085823
DO - 10.1002/alz.085823
M3 - Abstract/Meeting Abstract
C2 - 39750681
AN - SCOPUS:85214483680
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 20
JO - Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
JF - Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
IS - S3
M1 - e085823
T2 - Alzheimer’s Association International Conference (AAIC®) 2024
Y2 - 28 July 2024 through 1 August 2024
ER -