Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping: Which better predicts athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping?

Derwin King Chung Chan, David A. Keatley, Tracy C.W. Tang, James A. Dimmock, Martin S. Hagger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This preliminary study examined whether implicit doping attitude, explicit doping attitude, or both, predicted athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Design: A cross-sectional correlational design. Methods: Australian athletes (N=143; M age =18.13, SD = 4.63) completed measures of implicit doping attitude (brief single-category implicit association test), explicit doping attitude (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale), avoidance of unintentional doping (Self-Reported Treatment Adherence Scale), and behavioural vigilance task of unintentional doping (reading the ingredients of an unfamiliar food product). Results: Positive implicit doping attitude and explicit doping attitude were negatively related to athletes' likelihood of reading the ingredients table of an unfamiliar food product, and positively related to athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Neither attitude measures predicted avoidance of unintentional doping. Overall, the magnitude of associations by implicit doping attitude appeared to be stronger than that of explicit doping attitude. Conclusions: Athletes with positive implicit and explicit doping attitudes were less likely to read the ingredients table of an unknown food product, but were more likely to be aware of the possible presence of banned substances in a certain food product. Implicit doping attitude appeared to explain athletes' behavioural response to the avoidance of unintentional doping beyond variance explained by explicit doping attitude.

LanguageEnglish
Pages238-244
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Athletes
Food
Reading

Cite this

Chan, Derwin King Chung ; Keatley, David A. ; Tang, Tracy C.W. ; Dimmock, James A. ; Hagger, Martin S. / Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping : Which better predicts athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping?. In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 238-244.
@article{ce8a00663f884116b8230d8c3c9f54d5,
title = "Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping: Which better predicts athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping?",
abstract = "Objectives: This preliminary study examined whether implicit doping attitude, explicit doping attitude, or both, predicted athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Design: A cross-sectional correlational design. Methods: Australian athletes (N=143; M age =18.13, SD = 4.63) completed measures of implicit doping attitude (brief single-category implicit association test), explicit doping attitude (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale), avoidance of unintentional doping (Self-Reported Treatment Adherence Scale), and behavioural vigilance task of unintentional doping (reading the ingredients of an unfamiliar food product). Results: Positive implicit doping attitude and explicit doping attitude were negatively related to athletes' likelihood of reading the ingredients table of an unfamiliar food product, and positively related to athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Neither attitude measures predicted avoidance of unintentional doping. Overall, the magnitude of associations by implicit doping attitude appeared to be stronger than that of explicit doping attitude. Conclusions: Athletes with positive implicit and explicit doping attitudes were less likely to read the ingredients table of an unknown food product, but were more likely to be aware of the possible presence of banned substances in a certain food product. Implicit doping attitude appeared to explain athletes' behavioural response to the avoidance of unintentional doping beyond variance explained by explicit doping attitude.",
keywords = "Doping in sport, Implicit association test, Performance enhancing drugs, Prohibited substances",
author = "Chan, {Derwin King Chung} and Keatley, {David A.} and Tang, {Tracy C.W.} and Dimmock, {James A.} and Hagger, {Martin S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.020",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "238--244",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping : Which better predicts athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping? / Chan, Derwin King Chung; Keatley, David A.; Tang, Tracy C.W.; Dimmock, James A.; Hagger, Martin S.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 21, No. 3, 03.2018, p. 238-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping

T2 - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

AU - Chan, Derwin King Chung

AU - Keatley, David A.

AU - Tang, Tracy C.W.

AU - Dimmock, James A.

AU - Hagger, Martin S.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Objectives: This preliminary study examined whether implicit doping attitude, explicit doping attitude, or both, predicted athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Design: A cross-sectional correlational design. Methods: Australian athletes (N=143; M age =18.13, SD = 4.63) completed measures of implicit doping attitude (brief single-category implicit association test), explicit doping attitude (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale), avoidance of unintentional doping (Self-Reported Treatment Adherence Scale), and behavioural vigilance task of unintentional doping (reading the ingredients of an unfamiliar food product). Results: Positive implicit doping attitude and explicit doping attitude were negatively related to athletes' likelihood of reading the ingredients table of an unfamiliar food product, and positively related to athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Neither attitude measures predicted avoidance of unintentional doping. Overall, the magnitude of associations by implicit doping attitude appeared to be stronger than that of explicit doping attitude. Conclusions: Athletes with positive implicit and explicit doping attitudes were less likely to read the ingredients table of an unknown food product, but were more likely to be aware of the possible presence of banned substances in a certain food product. Implicit doping attitude appeared to explain athletes' behavioural response to the avoidance of unintentional doping beyond variance explained by explicit doping attitude.

AB - Objectives: This preliminary study examined whether implicit doping attitude, explicit doping attitude, or both, predicted athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Design: A cross-sectional correlational design. Methods: Australian athletes (N=143; M age =18.13, SD = 4.63) completed measures of implicit doping attitude (brief single-category implicit association test), explicit doping attitude (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale), avoidance of unintentional doping (Self-Reported Treatment Adherence Scale), and behavioural vigilance task of unintentional doping (reading the ingredients of an unfamiliar food product). Results: Positive implicit doping attitude and explicit doping attitude were negatively related to athletes' likelihood of reading the ingredients table of an unfamiliar food product, and positively related to athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping. Neither attitude measures predicted avoidance of unintentional doping. Overall, the magnitude of associations by implicit doping attitude appeared to be stronger than that of explicit doping attitude. Conclusions: Athletes with positive implicit and explicit doping attitudes were less likely to read the ingredients table of an unknown food product, but were more likely to be aware of the possible presence of banned substances in a certain food product. Implicit doping attitude appeared to explain athletes' behavioural response to the avoidance of unintentional doping beyond variance explained by explicit doping attitude.

KW - Doping in sport

KW - Implicit association test

KW - Performance enhancing drugs

KW - Prohibited substances

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020384986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.020

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 238

EP - 244

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 3

ER -