Impact of volunteer-related and methodology-related factors on the reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation: Analysis of 672 individual repeated measurements

A.C.C.M. Van Mil, A. Greyling, P.L. Zock, J.M. Geleijnse, M.T. Hopman, R.P. Mensink, K.D. Reesink, Daniel J. Green, L. Ghiadoni, D.H. Thijssen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.Objectives: Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a popular technique to examine endothelial function in humans. Identifying volunteer and methodological factors related to variation in FMD is important to improve measurement accuracy and applicability. Methods: Volunteer-related and methodology-related parameters were collected in 672 volunteers from eight affiliated centres worldwide who underwent repeated measures of FMD. All centres adopted contemporary expert-consensus guidelines for FMD assessment. After calculating the coefficient of variation (%) of the FMD for each individual, we constructed quartiles (n = 168 per quartile). Based on two regression models (volunteer-related factors and methodology-related factors), statistically significant components of these two models were added to a final regression model (calculated as ß-coefficient and R 2). This allowed us to identify factors that independently contributed to the variation in FMD%. Results: Median coefficient of variation was 17.5%, with healthy volunteers demonstrating a coefficient of variation 9.3%. Regression models revealed age (ß = 0.248, P <0.001), hypertension (ß = 0.104, P <0.001), dyslipidemia (ß = 0.331, P <0.001), time between measurements (ß = 0.318, P <0.001), lab experience (ß = -0.133, P <0.001) and baseline FMD% (ß = 0.082, P <0.05) as contributors to the coefficient of variation. After including all significant factors in the final model, we found that time between measurements, hypertension, baseline FMD% and lab experience with FMD independently predicted brachial artery variability (total R2 = 0.202). Conclusion: Although FMD% showed good reproducibility, larger variation was observed in conditions with longer time between measurements, hypertension, less experience and lower baseline FMD%. Accounting for these factors may improve FMD% variability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1738-1745
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Hypertension
    Volume34
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of volunteer-related and methodology-related factors on the reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation: Analysis of 672 individual repeated measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Van Mil, A. C. C. M., Greyling, A., Zock, P. L., Geleijnse, J. M., Hopman, M. T., Mensink, R. P., Reesink, K. D., Green, D. J., Ghiadoni, L., & Thijssen, D. H. (2016). Impact of volunteer-related and methodology-related factors on the reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation: Analysis of 672 individual repeated measurements. Journal of Hypertension, 34(9), 1738-1745. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001012