Abstract
At the 6th ITI Consensus Conference in 2018, a new
classifcation system that combines the implant placement
time and the anticipated loading protocol was introduced
by Gallucci and co-workers (Gallucci et al. 2018). For immediate (type 1) implant placement, three implant placement/loading protocols were defned. These are: type 1A (defned as immediate placement and immediate restoration/loading), type 1B (defned as immediate placement and early loading) and type 1C (defned as
immediate placement and conventional loading). The levels
of evidence and weighted mean and median survival rates
for each of the three protocols is reproduced from the
publication. The indications, and surgical and prosthodontic
procedures for the three protocols are described and
illustrated by case reports.
classifcation system that combines the implant placement
time and the anticipated loading protocol was introduced
by Gallucci and co-workers (Gallucci et al. 2018). For immediate (type 1) implant placement, three implant placement/loading protocols were defned. These are: type 1A (defned as immediate placement and immediate restoration/loading), type 1B (defned as immediate placement and early loading) and type 1C (defned as
immediate placement and conventional loading). The levels
of evidence and weighted mean and median survival rates
for each of the three protocols is reproduced from the
publication. The indications, and surgical and prosthodontic
procedures for the three protocols are described and
illustrated by case reports.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 4-21 |
| Volume | 15 |
| No. | 1 |
| Specialist publication | Forum Implantologicum |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |