Imaging flow cytometry in the assessment of leukocyte-platelet aggregates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Platelets are subcellular blood elements with a well-established role in haemostasis. Upon activation platelets undergo granule exocytosis, resulting in α-granule P-Selectin being expressed on the cell membrane. This allows binding of activated platelets to P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) expressing leukocytes, forming leukocyte-platelet aggregates (LPAs). Whole blood flow cytometry (FCM) has demonstrated that elevated circulating LPAs (especially monocyte LPAs) are linked to atherothrombosis in high risk patients, and that activated platelet binding influences monocytes towards a pro-adhesive and pro-atherogenic phenotype. However, a limitation of conventional FCM is the potential for coincident events to resemble LPAs despite no tethering. Imaging cytometry can be used to characterize LPA formation and distinguish circulating MPAs from coincidental events. Platelets and leukocyte subsets are identified by expression of surface markers (e.g. the lipopolysachharide receptor CD14 on monocytes, glycoprotein Ib CD42b on platelets). In conventional FCM, all events with both leukocyte and platelet characteristics are designated as LPAs. However, by using an ‘internal’ mask based on the brightfield image and the fluorescent platelet identifier, imaging flow cytometry is able to distinguish leukocytes with tethered platelets (genuine LPAs) from leukocyte with coincidental, untethered platelets nearby. Mechanisms (e.g. adhesion molecules) or consequences (e.g. signal transduction) can then be separately analysed in platelet tethered and untethered leukocytes. Imaging flow cytometry therefore provides a more accurate approach for both enumeration and analysis of LPAs than conventional FCM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-54
Number of pages9
JournalMethods
Volume112
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Flow cytometry
Platelets
Flow Cytometry
Leukocytes
Blood Platelets
Imaging techniques
Monocytes
Blood
Platelet Glycoprotein GPIb-IX Complex
P-Selectin
Signal transduction
Platelet Activation
Exocytosis

Cite this

@article{a58f76dc565249a9af88e1f1f2514e83,
title = "Imaging flow cytometry in the assessment of leukocyte-platelet aggregates",
abstract = "Platelets are subcellular blood elements with a well-established role in haemostasis. Upon activation platelets undergo granule exocytosis, resulting in α-granule P-Selectin being expressed on the cell membrane. This allows binding of activated platelets to P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) expressing leukocytes, forming leukocyte-platelet aggregates (LPAs). Whole blood flow cytometry (FCM) has demonstrated that elevated circulating LPAs (especially monocyte LPAs) are linked to atherothrombosis in high risk patients, and that activated platelet binding influences monocytes towards a pro-adhesive and pro-atherogenic phenotype. However, a limitation of conventional FCM is the potential for coincident events to resemble LPAs despite no tethering. Imaging cytometry can be used to characterize LPA formation and distinguish circulating MPAs from coincidental events. Platelets and leukocyte subsets are identified by expression of surface markers (e.g. the lipopolysachharide receptor CD14 on monocytes, glycoprotein Ib CD42b on platelets). In conventional FCM, all events with both leukocyte and platelet characteristics are designated as LPAs. However, by using an ‘internal’ mask based on the brightfield image and the fluorescent platelet identifier, imaging flow cytometry is able to distinguish leukocytes with tethered platelets (genuine LPAs) from leukocyte with coincidental, untethered platelets nearby. Mechanisms (e.g. adhesion molecules) or consequences (e.g. signal transduction) can then be separately analysed in platelet tethered and untethered leukocytes. Imaging flow cytometry therefore provides a more accurate approach for both enumeration and analysis of LPAs than conventional FCM.",
keywords = "Cell-cell interactions, Coincidental events, Heterotypic aggregates, Imaging flow cytometry, Monocytes, Platelets",
author = "Henry Hui and Fuller, {Kathy A.} and Erber, {Wendy N.} and Linden, {Matthew D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "46--54",
journal = "Methods",
issn = "1046-2023",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging flow cytometry in the assessment of leukocyte-platelet aggregates

AU - Hui, Henry

AU - Fuller, Kathy A.

AU - Erber, Wendy N.

AU - Linden, Matthew D.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Platelets are subcellular blood elements with a well-established role in haemostasis. Upon activation platelets undergo granule exocytosis, resulting in α-granule P-Selectin being expressed on the cell membrane. This allows binding of activated platelets to P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) expressing leukocytes, forming leukocyte-platelet aggregates (LPAs). Whole blood flow cytometry (FCM) has demonstrated that elevated circulating LPAs (especially monocyte LPAs) are linked to atherothrombosis in high risk patients, and that activated platelet binding influences monocytes towards a pro-adhesive and pro-atherogenic phenotype. However, a limitation of conventional FCM is the potential for coincident events to resemble LPAs despite no tethering. Imaging cytometry can be used to characterize LPA formation and distinguish circulating MPAs from coincidental events. Platelets and leukocyte subsets are identified by expression of surface markers (e.g. the lipopolysachharide receptor CD14 on monocytes, glycoprotein Ib CD42b on platelets). In conventional FCM, all events with both leukocyte and platelet characteristics are designated as LPAs. However, by using an ‘internal’ mask based on the brightfield image and the fluorescent platelet identifier, imaging flow cytometry is able to distinguish leukocytes with tethered platelets (genuine LPAs) from leukocyte with coincidental, untethered platelets nearby. Mechanisms (e.g. adhesion molecules) or consequences (e.g. signal transduction) can then be separately analysed in platelet tethered and untethered leukocytes. Imaging flow cytometry therefore provides a more accurate approach for both enumeration and analysis of LPAs than conventional FCM.

AB - Platelets are subcellular blood elements with a well-established role in haemostasis. Upon activation platelets undergo granule exocytosis, resulting in α-granule P-Selectin being expressed on the cell membrane. This allows binding of activated platelets to P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) expressing leukocytes, forming leukocyte-platelet aggregates (LPAs). Whole blood flow cytometry (FCM) has demonstrated that elevated circulating LPAs (especially monocyte LPAs) are linked to atherothrombosis in high risk patients, and that activated platelet binding influences monocytes towards a pro-adhesive and pro-atherogenic phenotype. However, a limitation of conventional FCM is the potential for coincident events to resemble LPAs despite no tethering. Imaging cytometry can be used to characterize LPA formation and distinguish circulating MPAs from coincidental events. Platelets and leukocyte subsets are identified by expression of surface markers (e.g. the lipopolysachharide receptor CD14 on monocytes, glycoprotein Ib CD42b on platelets). In conventional FCM, all events with both leukocyte and platelet characteristics are designated as LPAs. However, by using an ‘internal’ mask based on the brightfield image and the fluorescent platelet identifier, imaging flow cytometry is able to distinguish leukocytes with tethered platelets (genuine LPAs) from leukocyte with coincidental, untethered platelets nearby. Mechanisms (e.g. adhesion molecules) or consequences (e.g. signal transduction) can then be separately analysed in platelet tethered and untethered leukocytes. Imaging flow cytometry therefore provides a more accurate approach for both enumeration and analysis of LPAs than conventional FCM.

KW - Cell-cell interactions

KW - Coincidental events

KW - Heterotypic aggregates

KW - Imaging flow cytometry

KW - Monocytes

KW - Platelets

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992089000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 46

EP - 54

JO - Methods

JF - Methods

SN - 1046-2023

ER -