TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying the drivers of silky shark distribution and an evaluation of protection measures
AU - Murray, Shona
AU - Meeuwig, Jessica J.
AU - Thompson, Christopher D.H.
AU - Mouillot, David
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Ascension Department of Fisheries, Australian Academy of Science, Australian Department of the Environment, Australian Marine Conservation Society, the Bertarelli Foundation, the Blue Belt Programme, the Darwin Foundation, Fondation Total, Galapagos Science Center, the Ian Potter Foundation, the Jock Clough Marine Foundation, Margaret Middleton Fund, Migramar, National Environment Science Centre Marine Biodiversity Hub, National Geographic’s Pristine Seas Program, NorthPort Marine, Outpost Expedition Pacific, Quest Maritime, RSPB Wildlife, Teach Green, UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Vermillion Energy and the Waitt Institute for their generous donations which supported data collection. All sampling was conducted under University of Western Australia ethics permit RA/3/100/1484 and appropriate Australian and international field permits.
Funding Information:
We thank the Ascension Department of Fisheries, Australian Academy of Science, Australian Department of the Environment, Australian Marine Conservation Society, the Bertarelli Foundation, the Blue Belt Programme, the Darwin Foundation, Fondation Total, Galapagos Science Center, the Ian Potter Foundation, the Jock Clough Marine Foundation, Margaret Middleton Fund, Migramar, National Environment Science Centre Marine Biodiversity Hub, National Geographic’s Pristine Seas Program, NorthPort Marine, Outpost Expedition Pacific, Quest Maritime, RSPB Wildlife, Teach Green, UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Vermillion Energy and the Waitt Institute for their generous donations which supported data collection. All sampling was conducted under University of Western Australia ethics permit RA/3/100/1484 and appropriate Australian and international field permits.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - The silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) has experienced a significant population decline associated with intense targeted and incidental fishing pressure. Large marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly advocated for the conservation of oceanic species like silky sharks, recognising that the benefits of MPAs to such species depend on a comprehensive understanding of their distribution, abundance and life history. We combined mid-water stereo-baited remote underwater video system (BRUVS) records with environmental, geographic and anthropogenic variables to document the distribution and abundance of silky shark populations, identify the most important predictors of their presence, abundance and body size, and determine if their abundance is greater within MPAs than in locations not designated as MPAs. From 1418 deployments of mid-water BRUVS across three ocean basins, 945 silky sharks were identified at 18 locations, with young-of-year (< 87 cm TL) observed at four of these. Our study revealed generally low abundances of silky sharks as recorded on mid-water BRUVS across their cosmopolitan distribution, although our models identified seamounts as hotspots of abundance. Human pressure was a significant variable within our models, with proximity to human populations and ports being key drivers of silky shark abundance and body size. We did not observe a higher abundance of silky sharks inside MPAs compared to locations not designated as MPAs, suggesting that these MPAs have not been placed in areas where silky sharks remain relatively abundant. We therefore recommend expanding the current MPA network in line with the 30 × 30 initiative to more effectively protect key habitats such as seamounts.
AB - The silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) has experienced a significant population decline associated with intense targeted and incidental fishing pressure. Large marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly advocated for the conservation of oceanic species like silky sharks, recognising that the benefits of MPAs to such species depend on a comprehensive understanding of their distribution, abundance and life history. We combined mid-water stereo-baited remote underwater video system (BRUVS) records with environmental, geographic and anthropogenic variables to document the distribution and abundance of silky shark populations, identify the most important predictors of their presence, abundance and body size, and determine if their abundance is greater within MPAs than in locations not designated as MPAs. From 1418 deployments of mid-water BRUVS across three ocean basins, 945 silky sharks were identified at 18 locations, with young-of-year (< 87 cm TL) observed at four of these. Our study revealed generally low abundances of silky sharks as recorded on mid-water BRUVS across their cosmopolitan distribution, although our models identified seamounts as hotspots of abundance. Human pressure was a significant variable within our models, with proximity to human populations and ports being key drivers of silky shark abundance and body size. We did not observe a higher abundance of silky sharks inside MPAs compared to locations not designated as MPAs, suggesting that these MPAs have not been placed in areas where silky sharks remain relatively abundant. We therefore recommend expanding the current MPA network in line with the 30 × 30 initiative to more effectively protect key habitats such as seamounts.
KW - Baited remote underwater video systems
KW - Marine predator
KW - Marine protected areas
KW - Seamount
KW - Silky shark
KW - Spatial protection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166017198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10641-023-01437-7
DO - 10.1007/s10641-023-01437-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166017198
SN - 0378-1909
VL - 106
SP - 1693
EP - 1713
JO - Environmental Biology of Fishes
JF - Environmental Biology of Fishes
IS - 8
ER -