'I feel mad so I be bad': the role of affect, dissatisfaction and stress in determining responses to interpersonal deviance

Rebecca T. Michalak, Sandra Anne Kiffin-Petersen, Neal M. Ashkanasy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interpersonal deviance relates to a range of destructive individual and organizational outcomes. To date, however, scholars have largely failed to explore this issue from the perspective of the targeted individuals; and in particular how and why such negative outcomes manifest. To provide insights into this question, and based in principles of critical realism, we utilized semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore employees’ interpersonal deviance experiences, their responses and determinants of response selections, including: (1) emotions and feelings; (2) dissatisfaction and stress. We found that the traditional model, where responses are driven by dissatisfaction and confined to exit, voice, loyalty and neglect (EVLN), is inadequate. We therefore extend the EVLN model to include retaliation (EVLN-R) and identify a range of other responses, including venting and seeking social support for inclusion in the typology. Moreover, contrary to traditional theorizing, we found that responses were determined first and foremost by emotions and feelings, followed by stress, with dissatisfaction of little to no importance. We propose a new, multi-dimensional response typology including self-orientated responses and make suggestions for future research to test our typology, before closing with the implications for practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-667
Number of pages23
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date28 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Personnel
Deviance
Dissatisfaction
Neglect
Exit
Loyalty
Emotion
Critical realism
Organizational outcomes
Theorizing
Social support
In-depth interviews
Retaliation
Employees
Inclusion

Cite this

@article{59908ab069b540d788b665913fdc494b,
title = "'I feel mad so I be bad': the role of affect, dissatisfaction and stress in determining responses to interpersonal deviance",
abstract = "Interpersonal deviance relates to a range of destructive individual and organizational outcomes. To date, however, scholars have largely failed to explore this issue from the perspective of the targeted individuals; and in particular how and why such negative outcomes manifest. To provide insights into this question, and based in principles of critical realism, we utilized semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore employees’ interpersonal deviance experiences, their responses and determinants of response selections, including: (1) emotions and feelings; (2) dissatisfaction and stress. We found that the traditional model, where responses are driven by dissatisfaction and confined to exit, voice, loyalty and neglect (EVLN), is inadequate. We therefore extend the EVLN model to include retaliation (EVLN-R) and identify a range of other responses, including venting and seeking social support for inclusion in the typology. Moreover, contrary to traditional theorizing, we found that responses were determined first and foremost by emotions and feelings, followed by stress, with dissatisfaction of little to no importance. We propose a new, multi-dimensional response typology including self-orientated responses and make suggestions for future research to test our typology, before closing with the implications for practice.",
author = "Michalak, {Rebecca T.} and Kiffin-Petersen, {Sandra Anne} and Ashkanasy, {Neal M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8551.12286",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "645--667",
journal = "British Journal of Management",
issn = "1045-3172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

'I feel mad so I be bad': the role of affect, dissatisfaction and stress in determining responses to interpersonal deviance. / Michalak, Rebecca T.; Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra Anne; Ashkanasy, Neal M.

In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, 12.07.2019, p. 645-667.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'I feel mad so I be bad': the role of affect, dissatisfaction and stress in determining responses to interpersonal deviance

AU - Michalak, Rebecca T.

AU - Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra Anne

AU - Ashkanasy, Neal M.

PY - 2019/7/12

Y1 - 2019/7/12

N2 - Interpersonal deviance relates to a range of destructive individual and organizational outcomes. To date, however, scholars have largely failed to explore this issue from the perspective of the targeted individuals; and in particular how and why such negative outcomes manifest. To provide insights into this question, and based in principles of critical realism, we utilized semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore employees’ interpersonal deviance experiences, their responses and determinants of response selections, including: (1) emotions and feelings; (2) dissatisfaction and stress. We found that the traditional model, where responses are driven by dissatisfaction and confined to exit, voice, loyalty and neglect (EVLN), is inadequate. We therefore extend the EVLN model to include retaliation (EVLN-R) and identify a range of other responses, including venting and seeking social support for inclusion in the typology. Moreover, contrary to traditional theorizing, we found that responses were determined first and foremost by emotions and feelings, followed by stress, with dissatisfaction of little to no importance. We propose a new, multi-dimensional response typology including self-orientated responses and make suggestions for future research to test our typology, before closing with the implications for practice.

AB - Interpersonal deviance relates to a range of destructive individual and organizational outcomes. To date, however, scholars have largely failed to explore this issue from the perspective of the targeted individuals; and in particular how and why such negative outcomes manifest. To provide insights into this question, and based in principles of critical realism, we utilized semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore employees’ interpersonal deviance experiences, their responses and determinants of response selections, including: (1) emotions and feelings; (2) dissatisfaction and stress. We found that the traditional model, where responses are driven by dissatisfaction and confined to exit, voice, loyalty and neglect (EVLN), is inadequate. We therefore extend the EVLN model to include retaliation (EVLN-R) and identify a range of other responses, including venting and seeking social support for inclusion in the typology. Moreover, contrary to traditional theorizing, we found that responses were determined first and foremost by emotions and feelings, followed by stress, with dissatisfaction of little to no importance. We propose a new, multi-dimensional response typology including self-orientated responses and make suggestions for future research to test our typology, before closing with the implications for practice.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12286

DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12286

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 645

EP - 667

JO - British Journal of Management

JF - British Journal of Management

SN - 1045-3172

IS - 3

ER -