Hydrological versus biogeochemical controls on catchment nitrate export: A test of the flushing mechanism

Carlos Ocampo, Carolyn Oldham, M. Sivapalan, J.V. Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deciphering the connection between streamflows and nitrate (NO3-) discharge requires identification of the various water flow pathways within a catchment, and the different time-scales at which hydrological and biogeochemical processes occur. Despite the complexity of the processes involved, many catchments around the world present a characteristic flushing response of NO3- export. Yet the controls on the flushing response, and how they vary across space and time, are still not clearly understood. In this paper, the 'flushing response' of NO3- export from a rural catchment in Western Australia was investigated using isotopic (deuterium), chemical (chloride, NO3-) and hydrometric data across different antecedent conditions and time-scales. The catchment streamflow was at all time-scales dominated by a pre-event water source, and the NO3- discharge was correlated with the magnitude of areas contributing to saturation overland flow. The NO3- discharge also appeared related to the shallow groundwater dynamics. Thus, the antecedent moisture condition of the catchment at seasonal and interannual time-scales had a major impact on the NO3- flushing response. In particular, the dynamics of the shallow ephemeral perched aquifer drove a shift from hydrological controls on NO3- discharge during the 'early flushing' stage to an apparent biogeochemical control on NO3- discharge during the 'steady decline' stage of the flushing response. This temporally variable control hypothesis provides a new and alternative description of the mechanisms behind the commonly seen flushing response. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4269-4286
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume20
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

flushing
catchment
nitrate
timescale
streamflow
antecedent conditions
deuterium
overland flow
test
water flow
chloride
moisture
aquifer
saturation
groundwater

Cite this

@article{f4a3271df5434fd7885348d6b1bcb4dd,
title = "Hydrological versus biogeochemical controls on catchment nitrate export: A test of the flushing mechanism",
abstract = "Deciphering the connection between streamflows and nitrate (NO3-) discharge requires identification of the various water flow pathways within a catchment, and the different time-scales at which hydrological and biogeochemical processes occur. Despite the complexity of the processes involved, many catchments around the world present a characteristic flushing response of NO3- export. Yet the controls on the flushing response, and how they vary across space and time, are still not clearly understood. In this paper, the 'flushing response' of NO3- export from a rural catchment in Western Australia was investigated using isotopic (deuterium), chemical (chloride, NO3-) and hydrometric data across different antecedent conditions and time-scales. The catchment streamflow was at all time-scales dominated by a pre-event water source, and the NO3- discharge was correlated with the magnitude of areas contributing to saturation overland flow. The NO3- discharge also appeared related to the shallow groundwater dynamics. Thus, the antecedent moisture condition of the catchment at seasonal and interannual time-scales had a major impact on the NO3- flushing response. In particular, the dynamics of the shallow ephemeral perched aquifer drove a shift from hydrological controls on NO3- discharge during the 'early flushing' stage to an apparent biogeochemical control on NO3- discharge during the 'steady decline' stage of the flushing response. This temporally variable control hypothesis provides a new and alternative description of the mechanisms behind the commonly seen flushing response. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "Carlos Ocampo and Carolyn Oldham and M. Sivapalan and J.V. Turner",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.6311",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "4269--4286",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "20",

}

Hydrological versus biogeochemical controls on catchment nitrate export: A test of the flushing mechanism. / Ocampo, Carlos; Oldham, Carolyn; Sivapalan, M.; Turner, J.V.

In: Hydrological Processes, Vol. 20, No. 20, 2006, p. 4269-4286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hydrological versus biogeochemical controls on catchment nitrate export: A test of the flushing mechanism

AU - Ocampo, Carlos

AU - Oldham, Carolyn

AU - Sivapalan, M.

AU - Turner, J.V.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Deciphering the connection between streamflows and nitrate (NO3-) discharge requires identification of the various water flow pathways within a catchment, and the different time-scales at which hydrological and biogeochemical processes occur. Despite the complexity of the processes involved, many catchments around the world present a characteristic flushing response of NO3- export. Yet the controls on the flushing response, and how they vary across space and time, are still not clearly understood. In this paper, the 'flushing response' of NO3- export from a rural catchment in Western Australia was investigated using isotopic (deuterium), chemical (chloride, NO3-) and hydrometric data across different antecedent conditions and time-scales. The catchment streamflow was at all time-scales dominated by a pre-event water source, and the NO3- discharge was correlated with the magnitude of areas contributing to saturation overland flow. The NO3- discharge also appeared related to the shallow groundwater dynamics. Thus, the antecedent moisture condition of the catchment at seasonal and interannual time-scales had a major impact on the NO3- flushing response. In particular, the dynamics of the shallow ephemeral perched aquifer drove a shift from hydrological controls on NO3- discharge during the 'early flushing' stage to an apparent biogeochemical control on NO3- discharge during the 'steady decline' stage of the flushing response. This temporally variable control hypothesis provides a new and alternative description of the mechanisms behind the commonly seen flushing response. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Deciphering the connection between streamflows and nitrate (NO3-) discharge requires identification of the various water flow pathways within a catchment, and the different time-scales at which hydrological and biogeochemical processes occur. Despite the complexity of the processes involved, many catchments around the world present a characteristic flushing response of NO3- export. Yet the controls on the flushing response, and how they vary across space and time, are still not clearly understood. In this paper, the 'flushing response' of NO3- export from a rural catchment in Western Australia was investigated using isotopic (deuterium), chemical (chloride, NO3-) and hydrometric data across different antecedent conditions and time-scales. The catchment streamflow was at all time-scales dominated by a pre-event water source, and the NO3- discharge was correlated with the magnitude of areas contributing to saturation overland flow. The NO3- discharge also appeared related to the shallow groundwater dynamics. Thus, the antecedent moisture condition of the catchment at seasonal and interannual time-scales had a major impact on the NO3- flushing response. In particular, the dynamics of the shallow ephemeral perched aquifer drove a shift from hydrological controls on NO3- discharge during the 'early flushing' stage to an apparent biogeochemical control on NO3- discharge during the 'steady decline' stage of the flushing response. This temporally variable control hypothesis provides a new and alternative description of the mechanisms behind the commonly seen flushing response. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.6311

DO - 10.1002/hyp.6311

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 4269

EP - 4286

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 20

ER -