How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise?

Kate Crookes, Louise Ewing, J. Gildenhuys, Nadine Kloth, W.G. Hayward, M. Oxner, Stephen Pond, Gillian Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2015 Crookes et al This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The use of computer-generated (CG) stimuli in face processing research is proliferating due to the ease with which faces can be generated, standardised and manipulated. However there has been surprisingly little research into whether CG faces are processed in the same way as photographs of real faces. The present study assessed how well CG faces tap face identity expertise by investigating whether two indicators of face expertise are reduced for CG faces when compared to face photographs. These indicators were accuracy for identification of own-race faces and the other-race effect (ORE)-the well-established finding that own-race faces are recognised more accurately than other-race faces. In Experiment 1 Caucasian and Asian participants completed a recognition memory task for own- and otherrace real and CG faces. Overall accuracy for own-race faces was dramatically reduced for CG compared to real faces and the ORE was significantly and substantially attenuated for CG faces. Experiment 2 investigated perceptual discrimination for own- and other-race real and CG faces with Caucasian and Asian participants. Here again, accuracy for own-race faces was significantly reduced for CG compared to real faces. However the ORE was not affected by format. Together these results signal that CG faces of the type tested here do not fully tap face expertise. Technological advancement may, in the future, produce CG faces that are equivalent to real photographs. Until then caution is advised when interpreting results obtained using CG faces.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0141353
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalPLoS One
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2015

Fingerprint

photographs
Experiments
Data storage equipment
Licensure
Research
Reproduction
Processing
Discrimination (Psychology)
Recognition (Psychology)

Cite this

Crookes, K., Ewing, L., Gildenhuys, J., Kloth, N., Hayward, W. G., Oxner, M., ... Rhodes, G. (2015). How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise? PLoS One, 10(11), 1-18. [e0141353]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141353
Crookes, Kate ; Ewing, Louise ; Gildenhuys, J. ; Kloth, Nadine ; Hayward, W.G. ; Oxner, M. ; Pond, Stephen ; Rhodes, Gillian. / How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise?. In: PLoS One. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 11. pp. 1-18.
@article{683120e9f919473c9c25a2289d3e9522,
title = "How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise?",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2015 Crookes et al This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The use of computer-generated (CG) stimuli in face processing research is proliferating due to the ease with which faces can be generated, standardised and manipulated. However there has been surprisingly little research into whether CG faces are processed in the same way as photographs of real faces. The present study assessed how well CG faces tap face identity expertise by investigating whether two indicators of face expertise are reduced for CG faces when compared to face photographs. These indicators were accuracy for identification of own-race faces and the other-race effect (ORE)-the well-established finding that own-race faces are recognised more accurately than other-race faces. In Experiment 1 Caucasian and Asian participants completed a recognition memory task for own- and otherrace real and CG faces. Overall accuracy for own-race faces was dramatically reduced for CG compared to real faces and the ORE was significantly and substantially attenuated for CG faces. Experiment 2 investigated perceptual discrimination for own- and other-race real and CG faces with Caucasian and Asian participants. Here again, accuracy for own-race faces was significantly reduced for CG compared to real faces. However the ORE was not affected by format. Together these results signal that CG faces of the type tested here do not fully tap face expertise. Technological advancement may, in the future, produce CG faces that are equivalent to real photographs. Until then caution is advised when interpreting results obtained using CG faces.",
author = "Kate Crookes and Louise Ewing and J. Gildenhuys and Nadine Kloth and W.G. Hayward and M. Oxner and Stephen Pond and Gillian Rhodes",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0141353",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "P L o S One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLoS)",
number = "11",

}

Crookes, K, Ewing, L, Gildenhuys, J, Kloth, N, Hayward, WG, Oxner, M, Pond, S & Rhodes, G 2015, 'How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise?' PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 11, e0141353, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141353

How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise? / Crookes, Kate; Ewing, Louise; Gildenhuys, J.; Kloth, Nadine; Hayward, W.G.; Oxner, M.; Pond, Stephen; Rhodes, Gillian.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 11, e0141353, 04.11.2015, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise?

AU - Crookes, Kate

AU - Ewing, Louise

AU - Gildenhuys, J.

AU - Kloth, Nadine

AU - Hayward, W.G.

AU - Oxner, M.

AU - Pond, Stephen

AU - Rhodes, Gillian

PY - 2015/11/4

Y1 - 2015/11/4

N2 - © 2015 Crookes et al This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The use of computer-generated (CG) stimuli in face processing research is proliferating due to the ease with which faces can be generated, standardised and manipulated. However there has been surprisingly little research into whether CG faces are processed in the same way as photographs of real faces. The present study assessed how well CG faces tap face identity expertise by investigating whether two indicators of face expertise are reduced for CG faces when compared to face photographs. These indicators were accuracy for identification of own-race faces and the other-race effect (ORE)-the well-established finding that own-race faces are recognised more accurately than other-race faces. In Experiment 1 Caucasian and Asian participants completed a recognition memory task for own- and otherrace real and CG faces. Overall accuracy for own-race faces was dramatically reduced for CG compared to real faces and the ORE was significantly and substantially attenuated for CG faces. Experiment 2 investigated perceptual discrimination for own- and other-race real and CG faces with Caucasian and Asian participants. Here again, accuracy for own-race faces was significantly reduced for CG compared to real faces. However the ORE was not affected by format. Together these results signal that CG faces of the type tested here do not fully tap face expertise. Technological advancement may, in the future, produce CG faces that are equivalent to real photographs. Until then caution is advised when interpreting results obtained using CG faces.

AB - © 2015 Crookes et al This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The use of computer-generated (CG) stimuli in face processing research is proliferating due to the ease with which faces can be generated, standardised and manipulated. However there has been surprisingly little research into whether CG faces are processed in the same way as photographs of real faces. The present study assessed how well CG faces tap face identity expertise by investigating whether two indicators of face expertise are reduced for CG faces when compared to face photographs. These indicators were accuracy for identification of own-race faces and the other-race effect (ORE)-the well-established finding that own-race faces are recognised more accurately than other-race faces. In Experiment 1 Caucasian and Asian participants completed a recognition memory task for own- and otherrace real and CG faces. Overall accuracy for own-race faces was dramatically reduced for CG compared to real faces and the ORE was significantly and substantially attenuated for CG faces. Experiment 2 investigated perceptual discrimination for own- and other-race real and CG faces with Caucasian and Asian participants. Here again, accuracy for own-race faces was significantly reduced for CG compared to real faces. However the ORE was not affected by format. Together these results signal that CG faces of the type tested here do not fully tap face expertise. Technological advancement may, in the future, produce CG faces that are equivalent to real photographs. Until then caution is advised when interpreting results obtained using CG faces.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0141353

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0141353

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - P L o S One

JF - P L o S One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e0141353

ER -

Crookes K, Ewing L, Gildenhuys J, Kloth N, Hayward WG, Oxner M et al. How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise? PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):1-18. e0141353. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141353