How to optimize and evaluate diversity in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: statements from the GCIG Barcelona Meeting

Jalid Sehouli, Jolijn Boer, Alison H Brand, Amit M Oza, Jennifer O'Donnell, Katherine Bennett, Ros Glaspool, Chee Khoon Lee, Josee-Lyne Ethier, Philipp Harter, Veronika Seebacher-Shariat, Ting-Chang Chang, Paul A Cohen, Toon van Gorp, Adriana Chavez-Blanco, Stephen Welch, Hanna Hranovska, Sharon O'Toole, Christianne A R Lok, Ainhoa MadariagaJose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Alejandro Perez Fidalgo, David Tan, Judith Michels, Bhavana Pothuri, Noriko Fujiwara, Ora Rosengarten, Hiroshi Nishio, Se Ik Kim, Asima Mukopadhyay, Elisa Piovano, Sabrina Chiara Cecere, Elise C Kohn, Uma Mukherjee, Sara Nasser, Kristina Lindemann, Jennifer Croke, Xiaojun Chen, Franziska Geissler, Michael A Bookman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Findings from clinical trials have led to advancement of care for patients with gynecologic malignancies. However, restrictive inclusion of patients into trials has been widely criticized for inadequate representation of the real-world population. Ideally, patients enrolled in clinical trials should represent a broader population to enhance external validity and facilitate translation of outcomes across all relevant groups. Specifically, there has been a systematic lack of data for underrepresented groups, with many studies failing to report or differentiate study participants based on sociodemographic domains, such as race and ethnicity. As such, the impact of treatment in these underrepresented groups is poorly understood, and clinical outcomes according to various sociodemographic factors are infrequently assessed. Inclusion of diverse trial participants, with different racial and ethnic background, is essential for the understanding of factors that may impact clinical outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a multi-national meeting of clinical trial groups and industry with the goal of increasing equity, diversity, and inclusion in gynecologic cancer clinical trials and to address barriers to recruitment, participation, and harmonization of data collection and reporting. These Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) statements present recommendations and strategies for the gynecologic cancer research community to improve equity, diversity, and inclusion in gynecologic cancer clinical trials.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1677-1684
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
    Volume34
    Issue number11
    Early online date4 Nov 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How to optimize and evaluate diversity in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: statements from the GCIG Barcelona Meeting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this