How Stories in Memory Perpetuate the Continued Influence of False Information

Anne Hamby, Ullrich Ecker, David Brinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

People often encounter information that they subsequently learn is false. Past research has shown that people sometimes continue to use this misinformation in their reasoning, even if they remember that the information is false, which researchers refer to as the continued influence effect. The current work shows that the continued influence effect depends on the stories people have in memory: corrected misinformation was found to have a stronger effect on people's beliefs than information that was topically related to the story if it helped to provide a causal explanation of a story they had read previously. We argue this effect occurs because information that can fill a causal “gap” in a story enhances comprehension of the story event, which allows people to build a complete (if inaccurate) event model that they prefer over an accurate but incomplete event model. This effect is less likely to occur for stories in memory that end in a negative way, presumably because people are more motivated to accurately understand negative outcome events.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Communication
Research Personnel
Research

Cite this

@article{5ec9cb204b8949e1baa0ecad947b0c3d,
title = "How Stories in Memory Perpetuate the Continued Influence of False Information",
abstract = "People often encounter information that they subsequently learn is false. Past research has shown that people sometimes continue to use this misinformation in their reasoning, even if they remember that the information is false, which researchers refer to as the continued influence effect. The current work shows that the continued influence effect depends on the stories people have in memory: corrected misinformation was found to have a stronger effect on people's beliefs than information that was topically related to the story if it helped to provide a causal explanation of a story they had read previously. We argue this effect occurs because information that can fill a causal “gap” in a story enhances comprehension of the story event, which allows people to build a complete (if inaccurate) event model that they prefer over an accurate but incomplete event model. This effect is less likely to occur for stories in memory that end in a negative way, presumably because people are more motivated to accurately understand negative outcome events.",
keywords = "continued influence effect, Mental models, Misinformation",
author = "Anne Hamby and Ullrich Ecker and David Brinberg",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1002/jcpy.1135",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

How Stories in Memory Perpetuate the Continued Influence of False Information. / Hamby, Anne; Ecker, Ullrich; Brinberg, David.

In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, 07.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Stories in Memory Perpetuate the Continued Influence of False Information

AU - Hamby, Anne

AU - Ecker, Ullrich

AU - Brinberg, David

PY - 2019/8/7

Y1 - 2019/8/7

N2 - People often encounter information that they subsequently learn is false. Past research has shown that people sometimes continue to use this misinformation in their reasoning, even if they remember that the information is false, which researchers refer to as the continued influence effect. The current work shows that the continued influence effect depends on the stories people have in memory: corrected misinformation was found to have a stronger effect on people's beliefs than information that was topically related to the story if it helped to provide a causal explanation of a story they had read previously. We argue this effect occurs because information that can fill a causal “gap” in a story enhances comprehension of the story event, which allows people to build a complete (if inaccurate) event model that they prefer over an accurate but incomplete event model. This effect is less likely to occur for stories in memory that end in a negative way, presumably because people are more motivated to accurately understand negative outcome events.

AB - People often encounter information that they subsequently learn is false. Past research has shown that people sometimes continue to use this misinformation in their reasoning, even if they remember that the information is false, which researchers refer to as the continued influence effect. The current work shows that the continued influence effect depends on the stories people have in memory: corrected misinformation was found to have a stronger effect on people's beliefs than information that was topically related to the story if it helped to provide a causal explanation of a story they had read previously. We argue this effect occurs because information that can fill a causal “gap” in a story enhances comprehension of the story event, which allows people to build a complete (if inaccurate) event model that they prefer over an accurate but incomplete event model. This effect is less likely to occur for stories in memory that end in a negative way, presumably because people are more motivated to accurately understand negative outcome events.

KW - continued influence effect

KW - Mental models

KW - Misinformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071391874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcpy.1135

DO - 10.1002/jcpy.1135

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

ER -