How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

92 Citations (Scopus)


Contract cheating, or plagiarism via paid ghostwriting, is a significant academic ethical issue, especially as reliable methods for its prevention and detection in students’assignments remain elusive. Contract cheating in academic assessment has been the subject of much recent debate and concern. Although some scandals have attracted substantial media attention, little is known about the likely prevalence of contract cheating by students for their university assignments. Although rates of contract cheating tend to be low, criminological theories suggest that people who employ ghostwriters for their assignments are likely to re-offend, and little is known about re-offence rates in this form of academic misconduct. We combined previously-collected data sets (N = 1378) and conducted additional, and previously-unreported, analyses on self-report measures of contract cheating prevalence. We found that few students (3.5%), on aggregate, ever engaged in contract cheating but this varied substantially among samples (from 0.3% to 7.9%). Of those who ever engaged in contract cheating,62.5% did so more than once. The data also suggested that engagement in contract cheating is influenced by opportunity. These figures may help policy makers, and researchers who are creating contract cheating detection methods, to estimate base rates of contract cheating and the likelihood of re-offence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-124
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Academic Ethics
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this