How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contract cheating, or plagiarism via paid ghostwriting, is a significant academic ethical issue, especially as reliable methods for its prevention and detection in students’assignments remain elusive. Contract cheating in academic assessment has been the subject of much recent debate and concern. Although some scandals have attracted substantial media attention, little is known about the likely prevalence of contract cheating by students for their university assignments. Although rates of contract cheating tend to be low, criminological theories suggest that people who employ ghostwriters for their assignments are likely to re-offend, and little is known about re-offence rates in this form of academic misconduct. We combined previously-collected data sets (N = 1378) and conducted additional, and previously-unreported, analyses on self-report measures of contract cheating prevalence. We found that few students (3.5%), on aggregate, ever engaged in contract cheating but this varied substantially among samples (from 0.3% to 7.9%). Of those who ever engaged in contract cheating,62.5% did so more than once. The data also suggested that engagement in contract cheating is influenced by opportunity. These figures may help policy makers, and researchers who are creating contract cheating detection methods, to estimate base rates of contract cheating and the likelihood of re-offence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-124
JournalJournal of Academic Ethics
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

repeat offender
student
ghostwriter
Cheating
Repeats
Offenders
offense
scandal

Cite this

@article{93591a4a0d9844bb92f9884284cca394,
title = "How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders?",
abstract = "Contract cheating, or plagiarism via paid ghostwriting, is a significant academic ethical issue, especially as reliable methods for its prevention and detection in students’assignments remain elusive. Contract cheating in academic assessment has been the subject of much recent debate and concern. Although some scandals have attracted substantial media attention, little is known about the likely prevalence of contract cheating by students for their university assignments. Although rates of contract cheating tend to be low, criminological theories suggest that people who employ ghostwriters for their assignments are likely to re-offend, and little is known about re-offence rates in this form of academic misconduct. We combined previously-collected data sets (N = 1378) and conducted additional, and previously-unreported, analyses on self-report measures of contract cheating prevalence. We found that few students (3.5{\%}), on aggregate, ever engaged in contract cheating but this varied substantially among samples (from 0.3{\%} to 7.9{\%}). Of those who ever engaged in contract cheating,62.5{\%} did so more than once. The data also suggested that engagement in contract cheating is influenced by opportunity. These figures may help policy makers, and researchers who are creating contract cheating detection methods, to estimate base rates of contract cheating and the likelihood of re-offence.",
keywords = "Contract cheating, Ghostwriting, Prevalence, Plagiarism, Academic Integrity",
author = "Guy Curtis and Clare, {Joseph Patrick}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s10805-017-9278-x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "115--124",
journal = "Journal of Academic Ethics",
issn = "1570-1727",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders? / Curtis, Guy; Clare, Joseph Patrick.

In: Journal of Academic Ethics, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2017, p. 115-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders?

AU - Curtis, Guy

AU - Clare, Joseph Patrick

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Contract cheating, or plagiarism via paid ghostwriting, is a significant academic ethical issue, especially as reliable methods for its prevention and detection in students’assignments remain elusive. Contract cheating in academic assessment has been the subject of much recent debate and concern. Although some scandals have attracted substantial media attention, little is known about the likely prevalence of contract cheating by students for their university assignments. Although rates of contract cheating tend to be low, criminological theories suggest that people who employ ghostwriters for their assignments are likely to re-offend, and little is known about re-offence rates in this form of academic misconduct. We combined previously-collected data sets (N = 1378) and conducted additional, and previously-unreported, analyses on self-report measures of contract cheating prevalence. We found that few students (3.5%), on aggregate, ever engaged in contract cheating but this varied substantially among samples (from 0.3% to 7.9%). Of those who ever engaged in contract cheating,62.5% did so more than once. The data also suggested that engagement in contract cheating is influenced by opportunity. These figures may help policy makers, and researchers who are creating contract cheating detection methods, to estimate base rates of contract cheating and the likelihood of re-offence.

AB - Contract cheating, or plagiarism via paid ghostwriting, is a significant academic ethical issue, especially as reliable methods for its prevention and detection in students’assignments remain elusive. Contract cheating in academic assessment has been the subject of much recent debate and concern. Although some scandals have attracted substantial media attention, little is known about the likely prevalence of contract cheating by students for their university assignments. Although rates of contract cheating tend to be low, criminological theories suggest that people who employ ghostwriters for their assignments are likely to re-offend, and little is known about re-offence rates in this form of academic misconduct. We combined previously-collected data sets (N = 1378) and conducted additional, and previously-unreported, analyses on self-report measures of contract cheating prevalence. We found that few students (3.5%), on aggregate, ever engaged in contract cheating but this varied substantially among samples (from 0.3% to 7.9%). Of those who ever engaged in contract cheating,62.5% did so more than once. The data also suggested that engagement in contract cheating is influenced by opportunity. These figures may help policy makers, and researchers who are creating contract cheating detection methods, to estimate base rates of contract cheating and the likelihood of re-offence.

KW - Contract cheating

KW - Ghostwriting

KW - Prevalence

KW - Plagiarism

KW - Academic Integrity

U2 - 10.1007/s10805-017-9278-x

DO - 10.1007/s10805-017-9278-x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 115

EP - 124

JO - Journal of Academic Ethics

JF - Journal of Academic Ethics

SN - 1570-1727

IS - 2

ER -