How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease?

Frank Dudbridge, Suzanne J. Brown, Lynley Ward, Scott G. Wilson, John P. Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to perform whole-exome and, increasingly, whole-genome sequencing on large numbers of individuals has led to increased efforts to identify rare genetic variants that affect the risk of both common and rare diseases. In such applications, it is important to identify families that are segregating the rare variants of interest. For rare diseases or rare familial forms of common diseases, pedigrees with multiple affected members are clearly harbouring risk variants. For more common diseases, however, it may be unclear whether a family with a few affected members is segregating a familial disease, is the result of multiple sporadic cases, or is a mixture of familial cases and phenocopies. We provide calculations for the probability that a family is harbouring familial disease, presented in general terms that admit working guidelines for selecting families for current sequencing studies. Using examples motivated by our own studies of thyroid cancer and published studies of colorectal cancer, we show that for common diseases, families with exactly two affected first-degree relatives have only a moderate probability of segregating familial disease, but this probability is higher for families with three or more affected relatives, and those families should therefore be prioritised in sequencing studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-113
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Human Genetics
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Pedigree
Rare Diseases
Exome
Thyroid Neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Genome
Guidelines

Cite this

Dudbridge, Frank ; Brown, Suzanne J. ; Ward, Lynley ; Wilson, Scott G. ; Walsh, John P. / How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease?. In: Annals of Human Genetics. 2018 ; Vol. 82, No. 2. pp. 109-113.
@article{e50d5a6dca57406caad884a7fc9c874f,
title = "How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease?",
abstract = "The ability to perform whole-exome and, increasingly, whole-genome sequencing on large numbers of individuals has led to increased efforts to identify rare genetic variants that affect the risk of both common and rare diseases. In such applications, it is important to identify families that are segregating the rare variants of interest. For rare diseases or rare familial forms of common diseases, pedigrees with multiple affected members are clearly harbouring risk variants. For more common diseases, however, it may be unclear whether a family with a few affected members is segregating a familial disease, is the result of multiple sporadic cases, or is a mixture of familial cases and phenocopies. We provide calculations for the probability that a family is harbouring familial disease, presented in general terms that admit working guidelines for selecting families for current sequencing studies. Using examples motivated by our own studies of thyroid cancer and published studies of colorectal cancer, we show that for common diseases, families with exactly two affected first-degree relatives have only a moderate probability of segregating familial disease, but this probability is higher for families with three or more affected relatives, and those families should therefore be prioritised in sequencing studies.",
keywords = "familial disease, family history, rare variants, thyroid cancer, whole genome sequencing",
author = "Frank Dudbridge and Brown, {Suzanne J.} and Lynley Ward and Wilson, {Scott G.} and Walsh, {John P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ahg.12222",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "109--113",
journal = "Annals of Human Genetics",
issn = "0003-4800",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? / Dudbridge, Frank; Brown, Suzanne J.; Ward, Lynley; Wilson, Scott G.; Walsh, John P.

In: Annals of Human Genetics, Vol. 82, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 109-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease?

AU - Dudbridge, Frank

AU - Brown, Suzanne J.

AU - Ward, Lynley

AU - Wilson, Scott G.

AU - Walsh, John P.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - The ability to perform whole-exome and, increasingly, whole-genome sequencing on large numbers of individuals has led to increased efforts to identify rare genetic variants that affect the risk of both common and rare diseases. In such applications, it is important to identify families that are segregating the rare variants of interest. For rare diseases or rare familial forms of common diseases, pedigrees with multiple affected members are clearly harbouring risk variants. For more common diseases, however, it may be unclear whether a family with a few affected members is segregating a familial disease, is the result of multiple sporadic cases, or is a mixture of familial cases and phenocopies. We provide calculations for the probability that a family is harbouring familial disease, presented in general terms that admit working guidelines for selecting families for current sequencing studies. Using examples motivated by our own studies of thyroid cancer and published studies of colorectal cancer, we show that for common diseases, families with exactly two affected first-degree relatives have only a moderate probability of segregating familial disease, but this probability is higher for families with three or more affected relatives, and those families should therefore be prioritised in sequencing studies.

AB - The ability to perform whole-exome and, increasingly, whole-genome sequencing on large numbers of individuals has led to increased efforts to identify rare genetic variants that affect the risk of both common and rare diseases. In such applications, it is important to identify families that are segregating the rare variants of interest. For rare diseases or rare familial forms of common diseases, pedigrees with multiple affected members are clearly harbouring risk variants. For more common diseases, however, it may be unclear whether a family with a few affected members is segregating a familial disease, is the result of multiple sporadic cases, or is a mixture of familial cases and phenocopies. We provide calculations for the probability that a family is harbouring familial disease, presented in general terms that admit working guidelines for selecting families for current sequencing studies. Using examples motivated by our own studies of thyroid cancer and published studies of colorectal cancer, we show that for common diseases, families with exactly two affected first-degree relatives have only a moderate probability of segregating familial disease, but this probability is higher for families with three or more affected relatives, and those families should therefore be prioritised in sequencing studies.

KW - familial disease

KW - family history

KW - rare variants

KW - thyroid cancer

KW - whole genome sequencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041659213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ahg.12222

DO - 10.1111/ahg.12222

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 109

EP - 113

JO - Annals of Human Genetics

JF - Annals of Human Genetics

SN - 0003-4800

IS - 2

ER -