How children's justifications of the "best thing to do" in peer conflicts relate to their emotional and behavioral problems in early elementary school

Bonnie J. Leadbeater, Jeneva L. Ohan, Wendy L. Hoglund

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this three-year longitudinal study, children were asked to choose the "best" strategy for dealing with hypothetical peer provocations and to justify "why" that was their choice at the end of first, second, and third grades. Teachers and parents also rated children's emotional and behavioral problems. Children's justifications were subjected to qualitative analyses to identify distinct content categories. These included getting others into trouble or avoiding it, dichotomous reasoning about good (kind) versus bad (mean) strategies, appeals to authorities for help, situation-specific solutions that anticipated consequences of actions, or general rules or solutions that could or should be used in similar conflicts to effect positive outcomes. These justification categories were related to the children's grade levels. Older children were more likely to use more story-specific justifications and to refer to the perspectives of others and to future consequences in their justification responses. Children who used justifications that involved getting others into trouble or avoiding it had higher levels of teacher ratings of concurrent emotional and behavioral problems at second and third grades and to parent ratings of emotional problems at third grade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)721-754
Number of pages34
JournalMerrill-Palmer Quarterly
Volume52
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

elementary school
school grade
parents
provocation
teacher rating
Longitudinal Studies
Problem Behavior
Conflict (Psychology)
appeal
longitudinal study
Parents
rating
teacher

Cite this

@article{038b75e2791b46ad9f9b2dddf1514b4e,
title = "How children's justifications of the {"}best thing to do{"} in peer conflicts relate to their emotional and behavioral problems in early elementary school",
abstract = "In this three-year longitudinal study, children were asked to choose the {"}best{"} strategy for dealing with hypothetical peer provocations and to justify {"}why{"} that was their choice at the end of first, second, and third grades. Teachers and parents also rated children's emotional and behavioral problems. Children's justifications were subjected to qualitative analyses to identify distinct content categories. These included getting others into trouble or avoiding it, dichotomous reasoning about good (kind) versus bad (mean) strategies, appeals to authorities for help, situation-specific solutions that anticipated consequences of actions, or general rules or solutions that could or should be used in similar conflicts to effect positive outcomes. These justification categories were related to the children's grade levels. Older children were more likely to use more story-specific justifications and to refer to the perspectives of others and to future consequences in their justification responses. Children who used justifications that involved getting others into trouble or avoiding it had higher levels of teacher ratings of concurrent emotional and behavioral problems at second and third grades and to parent ratings of emotional problems at third grade.",
author = "Leadbeater, {Bonnie J.} and Ohan, {Jeneva L.} and Hoglund, {Wendy L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "721--754",
journal = "Merrill - Palmer Quarterly: journal of developmental psychology",
issn = "0272-930X",
publisher = "Wayne State University Press",
number = "4",

}

How children's justifications of the "best thing to do" in peer conflicts relate to their emotional and behavioral problems in early elementary school. / Leadbeater, Bonnie J.; Ohan, Jeneva L.; Hoglund, Wendy L.

In: Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 4, 01.10.2006, p. 721-754.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - How children's justifications of the "best thing to do" in peer conflicts relate to their emotional and behavioral problems in early elementary school

AU - Leadbeater, Bonnie J.

AU - Ohan, Jeneva L.

AU - Hoglund, Wendy L.

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - In this three-year longitudinal study, children were asked to choose the "best" strategy for dealing with hypothetical peer provocations and to justify "why" that was their choice at the end of first, second, and third grades. Teachers and parents also rated children's emotional and behavioral problems. Children's justifications were subjected to qualitative analyses to identify distinct content categories. These included getting others into trouble or avoiding it, dichotomous reasoning about good (kind) versus bad (mean) strategies, appeals to authorities for help, situation-specific solutions that anticipated consequences of actions, or general rules or solutions that could or should be used in similar conflicts to effect positive outcomes. These justification categories were related to the children's grade levels. Older children were more likely to use more story-specific justifications and to refer to the perspectives of others and to future consequences in their justification responses. Children who used justifications that involved getting others into trouble or avoiding it had higher levels of teacher ratings of concurrent emotional and behavioral problems at second and third grades and to parent ratings of emotional problems at third grade.

AB - In this three-year longitudinal study, children were asked to choose the "best" strategy for dealing with hypothetical peer provocations and to justify "why" that was their choice at the end of first, second, and third grades. Teachers and parents also rated children's emotional and behavioral problems. Children's justifications were subjected to qualitative analyses to identify distinct content categories. These included getting others into trouble or avoiding it, dichotomous reasoning about good (kind) versus bad (mean) strategies, appeals to authorities for help, situation-specific solutions that anticipated consequences of actions, or general rules or solutions that could or should be used in similar conflicts to effect positive outcomes. These justification categories were related to the children's grade levels. Older children were more likely to use more story-specific justifications and to refer to the perspectives of others and to future consequences in their justification responses. Children who used justifications that involved getting others into trouble or avoiding it had higher levels of teacher ratings of concurrent emotional and behavioral problems at second and third grades and to parent ratings of emotional problems at third grade.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947667896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 52

SP - 721

EP - 754

JO - Merrill - Palmer Quarterly: journal of developmental psychology

JF - Merrill - Palmer Quarterly: journal of developmental psychology

SN - 0272-930X

IS - 4

ER -