High Court – Appellate jurisdiction – Leave to appeal – Circumstances when leave necessary – Distinction between interlocutory and final judgment: Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs (2018) 92 ALJR 1039

Michael Douglas

High Court – Appellate jurisdiction – Leave to appeal – Circumstances when leave necessary – Distinction between interlocutory and final judgment: Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs (2018) 92 ALJR 1039

Michael Douglas

UWA Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	97
Number of pages	3
Journal	Australian Law Journal
Volume	93
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - 2019

Cite this

@article{5dfede0e40bb4dcd9e36a294f07c6f5a,

title = "High Court – Appellate jurisdiction – Leave to appeal – Circumstances when leave necessary – Distinction between interlocutory and final judgment: Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs (2018) 92 ALJR 1039",

author = "Michael Douglas",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

volume = "93",

pages = "97",

journal = "Australian Law Journal",

issn = "0004-9611",

publisher = "Lawbook Co.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High Court – Appellate jurisdiction – Leave to appeal – Circumstances when leave necessary – Distinction between interlocutory and final judgment

T2 - Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs (2018) 92 ALJR 1039

AU - Douglas, Michael

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0004-9611

VL - 93

SP - 97

JO - Australian Law Journal

JF - Australian Law Journal

IS - 2

ER -