Abstract
Introduction
Globally, B-mode ultrasound is the most common modality used for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. We aimed to assessthe correlation between qualitative liver ultrasound parameters, attenuation imaging (ATI) and histopathology-diagnosed steatosis gradeobtained from liver biopsy. Our secondary aim was to examine the interobserver variability of qualitative ultrasound features.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was performed which included adult patients (age≥18 years) who had same-day liverultrasound, ATI and liver biopsy for grading hepatic steatosis severity between 2018 and 2022. The qualitative US features forhepatic steatosis were independently scored by three radiologists and interobserver variability was examined. Histologic steatosisgrade, ATI and qualitative ultrasound parameters were compared.Results:Ninety patients were included; 67% female with a median age of 54 (IQR 39–65) years. The radiologist’s overallimpression had the highest correlation (very strongly correlated) with histologic steatosis grade (r=0.82, P<0.001). ATIcoefficient and all qualitative ultrasound B-mode features except for liver echotexture and focal fat sparing were stronglycorrelated with histologic steatosis grade (r≥0.70, P<0.001). Most qualitative ultrasound features had good agreementbetween observers (Kappa statistic 0.61–1.0, P<0.001), (Kendall coefficient 0.92, P<0.001).
Conclusion
The examined qualitative ultrasound parameters and ATI had good-excellent performance for diagnosing clinicallysignificant hepatic steatosis; however, the radiologist’s overall impression had the best correlation with histologic steatosis grade.Our findings suggest an ongoing role for qualitative liver ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis despite the emergence ofnewer quantitative measures
Globally, B-mode ultrasound is the most common modality used for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. We aimed to assessthe correlation between qualitative liver ultrasound parameters, attenuation imaging (ATI) and histopathology-diagnosed steatosis gradeobtained from liver biopsy. Our secondary aim was to examine the interobserver variability of qualitative ultrasound features.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was performed which included adult patients (age≥18 years) who had same-day liverultrasound, ATI and liver biopsy for grading hepatic steatosis severity between 2018 and 2022. The qualitative US features forhepatic steatosis were independently scored by three radiologists and interobserver variability was examined. Histologic steatosisgrade, ATI and qualitative ultrasound parameters were compared.Results:Ninety patients were included; 67% female with a median age of 54 (IQR 39–65) years. The radiologist’s overallimpression had the highest correlation (very strongly correlated) with histologic steatosis grade (r=0.82, P<0.001). ATIcoefficient and all qualitative ultrasound B-mode features except for liver echotexture and focal fat sparing were stronglycorrelated with histologic steatosis grade (r≥0.70, P<0.001). Most qualitative ultrasound features had good agreementbetween observers (Kappa statistic 0.61–1.0, P<0.001), (Kendall coefficient 0.92, P<0.001).
Conclusion
The examined qualitative ultrasound parameters and ATI had good-excellent performance for diagnosing clinicallysignificant hepatic steatosis; however, the radiologist’s overall impression had the best correlation with histologic steatosis grade.Our findings suggest an ongoing role for qualitative liver ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis despite the emergence ofnewer quantitative measures
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 179-188 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Australasian Journal of Ultrasound Medicine |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 25 Apr 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2024 |