Health information overload among health consumers: A scoping review

Israa Khaleel, Barbara Wimmer, Gregory Peterson, Syed Tabish Razi Zaidi, Erin Roehrer, Elizabeth Cummings, Kenneth Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective
To examine and identify the scope of research addressing health information overload in consumers.

Methods
In accordance with a published protocol, six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus), reference lists of included articles, and grey literature (Google Advanced Search and WorldCat) were searched. Articles in English were included, without any limit on the date of publication.

Results
Of the 69 records included for final analysis, 22 studies specifically examined health information overload, whereas the remainder peripherally discussed the concept alongside other concepts. The 22 studies focused on one or more of the following: 1) ways to measure health information overload (multi-item/single-item scales); 2) predictors of health information overload - these included low education level, health literacy, and socioeconomic status; and 3) interventions to address information overload, such as videotaped consultations or written materials. Cancer information overload was a popular topic amongst studies that focused on information overload.

Conclusion
Based on the identified studies, there is a clear need for future studies that investigate health information overload in consumers with chronic medical conditions other than cancer.

Practice Implications
This review is the initial step in facilitating future efforts to create health information that do not overload consumers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-32
Number of pages18
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health information overload among health consumers: A scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this