Health implications of age and gender injury patterns of non-vehicle pedestrian trauma

J. E. Rod, Mark King, Teresa Senserrick, Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Walking is a healthy, environmentally sustainable, and economically profitable transportation strategy for citizens and governments. Despite these benefits, it is also important to understand, and to inform health professionals, policymakers, and public infrastructure planners about, the preventable injury potential of walking in the transportation system and the distribution of injury by gender and age. This is especially important for non-vehicle pedestrian trauma, given that is more prevalent and there is less information available about its injury outcomes in comparison to pedestrian injury caused by vehicle collisions. Method: A retrospective cohort study, and cross-sectional bivariate and multivariate analyses of non-vehicle pedestrian trauma in the traffic environment (NVPTE) were conducted. Relative risks (RR) of the incidence of injury and prevalence of injury outcomes by age and gender were calculated using data collected by the Queensland Injury Surveillance Unit (QISU) in Australia. Results: Pedestrians aged 60+ have a consistently higher risk of NVPTE incidence when compared with pedestrians aged
Original languageEnglish
Article number101130
JournalJournal of Transport and Health
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health implications of age and gender injury patterns of non-vehicle pedestrian trauma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this