Haplotypic relationship between SNP and microsatellite markers at the NOS2A locus in two populations

David Burgner, K. Rocket, H. Ackerman, J. Hull, S. Usen, M. Pinder, D.P. Kwiatkowski

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The density of genetic markers required for successful association mapping of complex diseases depends on linkage disequilibrium (LD)between non-functional markers and functional variants. The haplotypic relationship between stable markers and potentially unstable but highly informative markers (e.g. microsatellites) indicates that LD might be maintained over considerable genetic distance in non-African populations, supporting the use of such 'mixed marker haplotypes' in LD-based mapping, and allowing inferences to be drawn about human origins. We investigated sequence variation in the proximal 2.6 kb of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2A) promoter and the relationship between SNP haplotypes and a pentanucleotide microsatellite (the 'NOS2A(-2.6) microsatellite') in Gambians and UK Caucasians. UK Caucasians exhibited a subset of sequence diversity observed in Gambians, sharing four of 11 SNPs and a similar haplotypic structure. Five SNPs were found in the sequence of interspersed repetitive DNA elements. In both populations, there was dramatic loss of LD between SNP haplotypes and microsatellite alleles across a very short physical distance, suggesting a high intrinsic mutation rate of the NOS2A(-2.6) microsatellite, the SNP haplotypes are relatively ancient, or that this was a region of frequent recombination. Understanding locus- and population-specific LD is essential when designing and interpreting genetic association studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)506-514
    JournalGenes and Immunity
    Volume4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Haplotypic relationship between SNP and microsatellite markers at the NOS2A locus in two populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this