Grip and muscle strength dynamometry are reliable and valid in patients with unhealed minor burn wounds

P. Gittings, M. Salet, Sally Burrows, M. Ruettermann, F.M. Wood, D. Edgar

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    © 2016 by the American Burn Association.Small burns are common and can cause disproportionate levels of disability. The ability to measure muscle impairment and consequent functional disability is a necessity during rehabilitation of patients. This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of grip and muscle strength dynamometry in patients with unhealed, minor burn wounds. Grip and muscle strength were assessed three times on each side. Assessment occurred at presentation for the initial injury and again every other day (or every 5 days beyond 10 days post injury) until discharge from the service. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation. Minimum detectable differences were calculated for each muscle group. Validity was assessed using regression analysis, incorporating appropriate burn severity measures and patient demographics. Thirty patients with TBSA ≤15% were assessed. Both grip and muscle strength demonstrated very good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85-0.96). Minimum detectable differences ranged from 3.8 to 8.0 kg. Validity of both forms of dynamometry was confirmed through associations with gender for all muscle groups (P
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)388-396
    JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
    Volume37
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Muscle Strength
    Hand Strength
    Wounds and Injuries
    Muscles
    Burns
    Reproducibility of Results
    Rehabilitation
    Regression Analysis
    Demography

    Cite this

    Gittings, P. ; Salet, M. ; Burrows, Sally ; Ruettermann, M. ; Wood, F.M. ; Edgar, D. / Grip and muscle strength dynamometry are reliable and valid in patients with unhealed minor burn wounds. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 388-396.
    @article{2c4b9ee9d5c041209aa9d217b41dba5c,
    title = "Grip and muscle strength dynamometry are reliable and valid in patients with unhealed minor burn wounds",
    abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 by the American Burn Association.Small burns are common and can cause disproportionate levels of disability. The ability to measure muscle impairment and consequent functional disability is a necessity during rehabilitation of patients. This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of grip and muscle strength dynamometry in patients with unhealed, minor burn wounds. Grip and muscle strength were assessed three times on each side. Assessment occurred at presentation for the initial injury and again every other day (or every 5 days beyond 10 days post injury) until discharge from the service. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation. Minimum detectable differences were calculated for each muscle group. Validity was assessed using regression analysis, incorporating appropriate burn severity measures and patient demographics. Thirty patients with TBSA ≤15{\%} were assessed. Both grip and muscle strength demonstrated very good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85-0.96). Minimum detectable differences ranged from 3.8 to 8.0 kg. Validity of both forms of dynamometry was confirmed through associations with gender for all muscle groups (P",
    author = "P. Gittings and M. Salet and Sally Burrows and M. Ruettermann and F.M. Wood and D. Edgar",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1097/BCR.0000000000000414",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "388--396",
    journal = "Journal of Burn Care & Research",
    issn = "1559-047X",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
    number = "6",

    }

    Grip and muscle strength dynamometry are reliable and valid in patients with unhealed minor burn wounds. / Gittings, P.; Salet, M.; Burrows, Sally; Ruettermann, M.; Wood, F.M.; Edgar, D.

    In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2016, p. 388-396.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Grip and muscle strength dynamometry are reliable and valid in patients with unhealed minor burn wounds

    AU - Gittings, P.

    AU - Salet, M.

    AU - Burrows, Sally

    AU - Ruettermann, M.

    AU - Wood, F.M.

    AU - Edgar, D.

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - © 2016 by the American Burn Association.Small burns are common and can cause disproportionate levels of disability. The ability to measure muscle impairment and consequent functional disability is a necessity during rehabilitation of patients. This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of grip and muscle strength dynamometry in patients with unhealed, minor burn wounds. Grip and muscle strength were assessed three times on each side. Assessment occurred at presentation for the initial injury and again every other day (or every 5 days beyond 10 days post injury) until discharge from the service. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation. Minimum detectable differences were calculated for each muscle group. Validity was assessed using regression analysis, incorporating appropriate burn severity measures and patient demographics. Thirty patients with TBSA ≤15% were assessed. Both grip and muscle strength demonstrated very good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85-0.96). Minimum detectable differences ranged from 3.8 to 8.0 kg. Validity of both forms of dynamometry was confirmed through associations with gender for all muscle groups (P

    AB - © 2016 by the American Burn Association.Small burns are common and can cause disproportionate levels of disability. The ability to measure muscle impairment and consequent functional disability is a necessity during rehabilitation of patients. This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of grip and muscle strength dynamometry in patients with unhealed, minor burn wounds. Grip and muscle strength were assessed three times on each side. Assessment occurred at presentation for the initial injury and again every other day (or every 5 days beyond 10 days post injury) until discharge from the service. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation. Minimum detectable differences were calculated for each muscle group. Validity was assessed using regression analysis, incorporating appropriate burn severity measures and patient demographics. Thirty patients with TBSA ≤15% were assessed. Both grip and muscle strength demonstrated very good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85-0.96). Minimum detectable differences ranged from 3.8 to 8.0 kg. Validity of both forms of dynamometry was confirmed through associations with gender for all muscle groups (P

    U2 - 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000414

    DO - 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000414

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 388

    EP - 396

    JO - Journal of Burn Care & Research

    JF - Journal of Burn Care & Research

    SN - 1559-047X

    IS - 6

    ER -