TY - JOUR
T1 - Global genotype by environment prediction competition reveals that diverse modeling strategies can deliver satisfactory maize yield estimates
AU - Washburn, Jacob D.
AU - Varela, Jose Ignacio
AU - Xavier, Alencar
AU - Chen, Qiuyue
AU - Ertl, David
AU - Gage, Joseph L.
AU - Holland, James B.
AU - Lima, Dayane Cristina
AU - Romay, Maria Cinta
AU - Lopez-Cruz, Marco
AU - de los Campos, Gustavo
AU - Barber, Wesley
AU - Zimmer, Cristiano
AU - Silva, Ignacio Trucillo
AU - Rocha, Fabiani
AU - Rincent, Renaud
AU - Ali, Baber
AU - Hu, Haixiao
AU - Runcie, Daniel E.
AU - Gusev, Kirill
AU - Slabodkin, Andrei
AU - Bax, Phillip
AU - Aubert, Julie
AU - Gangloff, Hugo
AU - Mary-Huard, Tristan
AU - Vanrenterghem, Theodore
AU - Quesada-Traver, Carles
AU - Yates, Steven
AU - Ariza-Suarez, Daniel
AU - Ulrich, Argeo
AU - Wyler, Michele
AU - Kick, Daniel R.
AU - Bellis, Emily S.
AU - Causey, Jason L.
AU - Chavez, Emilio Soriano
AU - Wang, Yixing
AU - Piyush, Ved
AU - Fernando, Gayara D.
AU - Hu, Robert K.
AU - Kumar, Rachit
AU - Timon, Annan J.
AU - Venkatesh, Rasika
AU - Aba, Kenia Segura
AU - Chen, Huan
AU - Ranaweera, Thilanka
AU - Shiu, Shin-Han
AU - Wang, Peiran
AU - Gordon, Max J.
AU - Amos, B. Kirtley
AU - Busato, Sebastiano
AU - Perondi, Daniel
AU - Gogna, Abhishek
AU - Psaroudakis, Dennis
AU - Chen, Chun-Peng James
AU - Al-Mamun, Hawlader A.
AU - Danilevicz, Monica F.
AU - Upadhyaya, Shriprabha R.
AU - Edwards, David
AU - de Leon, Natalia
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Predicting phenotypes from a combination of genetic and environmental factors is a grand challenge of modern biology. Slight improvements in this area have the potential to save lives, improve food and fuel security, permit better care of the planet, and create other positive outcomes. In 2022 and 2023, the first open-to-the-public Genomes to Fields initiative Genotype by Environment prediction competition was held using a large dataset including genomic variation, phenotype and weather measurements, and field management notes gathered by the project over 9 years. The competition attracted registrants from around the world with representation from academic, government, industry, and nonprofit institutions as well as unaffiliated. These participants came from diverse disciplines, including plant science, animal science, breeding, statistics, computational biology, and others. Some participants had no formal genetics or plant-related training, and some were just beginning their graduate education. The teams applied varied methods and strategies, providing a wealth of modeling knowledge based on a common dataset. The winner's strategy involved 2 models combining machine learning and traditional breeding tools: 1 model emphasized environment using features extracted by random forest, ridge regression, and least squares, and 1 focused on genetics. Other high-performing teams' methods included quantitative genetics, machine learning/deep learning, mechanistic models, and model ensembles. The dataset factors used, such as genetics, weather, and management data, were also diverse, demonstrating that no single model or strategy is far superior to all others within the context of this competition.
AB - Predicting phenotypes from a combination of genetic and environmental factors is a grand challenge of modern biology. Slight improvements in this area have the potential to save lives, improve food and fuel security, permit better care of the planet, and create other positive outcomes. In 2022 and 2023, the first open-to-the-public Genomes to Fields initiative Genotype by Environment prediction competition was held using a large dataset including genomic variation, phenotype and weather measurements, and field management notes gathered by the project over 9 years. The competition attracted registrants from around the world with representation from academic, government, industry, and nonprofit institutions as well as unaffiliated. These participants came from diverse disciplines, including plant science, animal science, breeding, statistics, computational biology, and others. Some participants had no formal genetics or plant-related training, and some were just beginning their graduate education. The teams applied varied methods and strategies, providing a wealth of modeling knowledge based on a common dataset. The winner's strategy involved 2 models combining machine learning and traditional breeding tools: 1 model emphasized environment using features extracted by random forest, ridge regression, and least squares, and 1 focused on genetics. Other high-performing teams' methods included quantitative genetics, machine learning/deep learning, mechanistic models, and model ensembles. The dataset factors used, such as genetics, weather, and management data, were also diverse, demonstrating that no single model or strategy is far superior to all others within the context of this competition.
KW - Competition
KW - Genotype by environment
KW - Maize
KW - Phenotype
KW - Prediction
KW - Yield
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217553138
U2 - 10.1093/genetics/iyae195
DO - 10.1093/genetics/iyae195
M3 - Article
C2 - 39576009
SN - 0016-6731
VL - 229
JO - Genetics
JF - Genetics
IS - 2
M1 - iyae195
ER -