Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations

Simon Allen, K.A. Bryant, R.H.S. Kraus, N.R. Loneragan, A.M. Kopps, A.M. Brown, L. Gerber, M. Krützen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    © 2016 John Wiley & Sons LtdThe identification of species and population boundaries is important in both evolutionary and conservation biology. In recent years, new population genetic and computational methods for estimating population parameters and testing hypotheses in a quantitative manner have emerged. Using a Bayesian framework and a quantitative model-testing approach, we evaluated the species status and genetic connectedness of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations off remote northwestern Australia, with a focus on pelagic ‘offshore’ dolphins subject to incidental capture in a trawl fishery. We analysed 71 dolphin samples from three sites beyond the 50 m depth contour (the inshore boundary of the fishery) and up to 170 km offshore, including incidentally caught and free-ranging individuals associating with trawl vessels, and 273 dolphins sampled at 12 coastal sites inshore of the 50 m depth contour and within 10 km of the coast. Results from 19 nuclear microsatellite markers showed significant population structure between dolphins from within the fishery and coastal sites, but also among dolphins from coastal sites, identifying three coastal populations. Moreover, we found no current or historic gene flow into the offshore population in the region of the fishery, indicating a complete lack of recruitment from coastal sites. Mitochondrial DNA corroborated our findings of genetic isolation between dolphins from the offshore population and coastal sites. Most offshore individuals formed a monophyletic clade with common bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus), while all 273 individuals sampled coastally formed a well-supported clade of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (T. aduncus). By including a quantitative modelling approach, our study explicitly took evolutionary processes into account for informing the conservation and management of protected species. As such, it may serve as a template for other, similarly inaccessible study populations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2735-2753
    JournalMolecular Ecology
    Volume25
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Bottle-Nosed Dolphin
    Tursiops
    genetic isolation
    Fisheries
    Tursiops truncatus
    dolphin
    Dolphins
    dolphins
    fishery
    fisheries
    Population
    Common Dolphins
    protected species
    Gene Flow
    Population Genetics
    hypothesis testing
    Mitochondrial DNA
    population genetics
    gene flow
    Microsatellite Repeats

    Cite this

    Allen, S., Bryant, K. A., Kraus, R. H. S., Loneragan, N. R., Kopps, A. M., Brown, A. M., ... Krützen, M. (2016). Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations. Molecular Ecology, 25(12), 2735-2753. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13622
    Allen, Simon ; Bryant, K.A. ; Kraus, R.H.S. ; Loneragan, N.R. ; Kopps, A.M. ; Brown, A.M. ; Gerber, L. ; Krützen, M. / Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations. In: Molecular Ecology. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 12. pp. 2735-2753.
    @article{83047028f9d9475ea22c0c60d0a8a196,
    title = "Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations",
    abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 John Wiley & Sons LtdThe identification of species and population boundaries is important in both evolutionary and conservation biology. In recent years, new population genetic and computational methods for estimating population parameters and testing hypotheses in a quantitative manner have emerged. Using a Bayesian framework and a quantitative model-testing approach, we evaluated the species status and genetic connectedness of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations off remote northwestern Australia, with a focus on pelagic ‘offshore’ dolphins subject to incidental capture in a trawl fishery. We analysed 71 dolphin samples from three sites beyond the 50 m depth contour (the inshore boundary of the fishery) and up to 170 km offshore, including incidentally caught and free-ranging individuals associating with trawl vessels, and 273 dolphins sampled at 12 coastal sites inshore of the 50 m depth contour and within 10 km of the coast. Results from 19 nuclear microsatellite markers showed significant population structure between dolphins from within the fishery and coastal sites, but also among dolphins from coastal sites, identifying three coastal populations. Moreover, we found no current or historic gene flow into the offshore population in the region of the fishery, indicating a complete lack of recruitment from coastal sites. Mitochondrial DNA corroborated our findings of genetic isolation between dolphins from the offshore population and coastal sites. Most offshore individuals formed a monophyletic clade with common bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus), while all 273 individuals sampled coastally formed a well-supported clade of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (T. aduncus). By including a quantitative modelling approach, our study explicitly took evolutionary processes into account for informing the conservation and management of protected species. As such, it may serve as a template for other, similarly inaccessible study populations.",
    author = "Simon Allen and K.A. Bryant and R.H.S. Kraus and N.R. Loneragan and A.M. Kopps and A.M. Brown and L. Gerber and M. Kr{\"u}tzen",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1111/mec.13622",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "2735--2753",
    journal = "Molecular Ecology",
    issn = "0962-1083",
    publisher = "Blackwell",
    number = "12",

    }

    Allen, S, Bryant, KA, Kraus, RHS, Loneragan, NR, Kopps, AM, Brown, AM, Gerber, L & Krützen, M 2016, 'Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations' Molecular Ecology, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2735-2753. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13622

    Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations. / Allen, Simon; Bryant, K.A.; Kraus, R.H.S.; Loneragan, N.R.; Kopps, A.M.; Brown, A.M.; Gerber, L.; Krützen, M.

    In: Molecular Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 12, 2016, p. 2735-2753.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations

    AU - Allen, Simon

    AU - Bryant, K.A.

    AU - Kraus, R.H.S.

    AU - Loneragan, N.R.

    AU - Kopps, A.M.

    AU - Brown, A.M.

    AU - Gerber, L.

    AU - Krützen, M.

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - © 2016 John Wiley & Sons LtdThe identification of species and population boundaries is important in both evolutionary and conservation biology. In recent years, new population genetic and computational methods for estimating population parameters and testing hypotheses in a quantitative manner have emerged. Using a Bayesian framework and a quantitative model-testing approach, we evaluated the species status and genetic connectedness of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations off remote northwestern Australia, with a focus on pelagic ‘offshore’ dolphins subject to incidental capture in a trawl fishery. We analysed 71 dolphin samples from three sites beyond the 50 m depth contour (the inshore boundary of the fishery) and up to 170 km offshore, including incidentally caught and free-ranging individuals associating with trawl vessels, and 273 dolphins sampled at 12 coastal sites inshore of the 50 m depth contour and within 10 km of the coast. Results from 19 nuclear microsatellite markers showed significant population structure between dolphins from within the fishery and coastal sites, but also among dolphins from coastal sites, identifying three coastal populations. Moreover, we found no current or historic gene flow into the offshore population in the region of the fishery, indicating a complete lack of recruitment from coastal sites. Mitochondrial DNA corroborated our findings of genetic isolation between dolphins from the offshore population and coastal sites. Most offshore individuals formed a monophyletic clade with common bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus), while all 273 individuals sampled coastally formed a well-supported clade of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (T. aduncus). By including a quantitative modelling approach, our study explicitly took evolutionary processes into account for informing the conservation and management of protected species. As such, it may serve as a template for other, similarly inaccessible study populations.

    AB - © 2016 John Wiley & Sons LtdThe identification of species and population boundaries is important in both evolutionary and conservation biology. In recent years, new population genetic and computational methods for estimating population parameters and testing hypotheses in a quantitative manner have emerged. Using a Bayesian framework and a quantitative model-testing approach, we evaluated the species status and genetic connectedness of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations off remote northwestern Australia, with a focus on pelagic ‘offshore’ dolphins subject to incidental capture in a trawl fishery. We analysed 71 dolphin samples from three sites beyond the 50 m depth contour (the inshore boundary of the fishery) and up to 170 km offshore, including incidentally caught and free-ranging individuals associating with trawl vessels, and 273 dolphins sampled at 12 coastal sites inshore of the 50 m depth contour and within 10 km of the coast. Results from 19 nuclear microsatellite markers showed significant population structure between dolphins from within the fishery and coastal sites, but also among dolphins from coastal sites, identifying three coastal populations. Moreover, we found no current or historic gene flow into the offshore population in the region of the fishery, indicating a complete lack of recruitment from coastal sites. Mitochondrial DNA corroborated our findings of genetic isolation between dolphins from the offshore population and coastal sites. Most offshore individuals formed a monophyletic clade with common bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus), while all 273 individuals sampled coastally formed a well-supported clade of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (T. aduncus). By including a quantitative modelling approach, our study explicitly took evolutionary processes into account for informing the conservation and management of protected species. As such, it may serve as a template for other, similarly inaccessible study populations.

    U2 - 10.1111/mec.13622

    DO - 10.1111/mec.13622

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 2735

    EP - 2753

    JO - Molecular Ecology

    JF - Molecular Ecology

    SN - 0962-1083

    IS - 12

    ER -