Gene expression levels assessed by oligonucleotide microarray analysis and quantitative real-time RT-PCR - how well do they correlate?

Peter Dallas, N.G. Gottardo, Martin Firth, Alex Beesley, Katrin Hoffmann, P.A. Terry, J.R. Freitas, Joanne Boag, Aaron Cummings, Ursula Kees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

262 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The use of microarray technology to assess gene expression levels is now widespread in biology. The validation of microarray results using independent mRNA quantitation techniques remains a desirable element of any microarray experiment. To facilitate the comparison of microarray expression data between laboratories it is essential that validation methodologies be critically examined. We have assessed the correlation between expression scores obtained for 48 human genes using oligonucleotide microarrays and the expression levels for the same genes measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR).Results: Correlations with qRT-PCR data were obtained using microarray data that were processed using robust multi-array analysis (RMA) and the MAS 5.0 algorithm. Our results indicate that when identical transcripts are targeted by the two methods, correlations between qRT-PCR and microarray data are generally strong (r = 0.89). However, we observed poor correlations between qRT-PCR and RMA or MAS 5.0 normalized microarray data for 13% or 16% of genes, respectively.Conclusion: These results highlight the complementarity of oligonucleotide microarray and qRT-PCR technologies for validation of gene expression measurements, while emphasizing the continuing requirement for caution in interpreting gene expression data.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10
JournalBMC Genomics
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gene expression levels assessed by oligonucleotide microarray analysis and quantitative real-time RT-PCR - how well do they correlate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this