TY - JOUR
T1 - Gastric Cancer and Circulating microRNAs
T2 - An Updated Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
AU - Aalami, Amir Hossein
AU - Aalami, Farnoosh
AU - Sahebkar, Amirhossein
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are now used as non-invasive diagnostic indicators in various malignancies. Objective Our objective is to use a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs in gastric cancer. Methods We reviewed databases and methodically obtained papers for analysis until October 15th, 2021. The random-effect meta-analysis was performed to construct pooled diagnostic parameters. To detect the causes of heterogeneity, spearman threshold effect analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. The I-2 and Chi-square tests were also used to examine the heterogeneity. The subgroup analyses were conducted based on sample types (serum/plasma/blood), normalized genes (U6, miR-16, and miR-39), qPCR mastermix (SYBR and Taqman), and country. Finally, the publication bias was estimated using Egger's funnel plot asymmetry test. Results A total of 40 articles covering 73 studies (59 microRNAs) were included, containing 11,022 participants (6,324 cases and 4,698 controls). The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.74-0.77), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78-0.80), 4.081 (95% CI: 3.43-4.85), 0.28 (95% CI: 0.25-0.32), 16.08 (95% CI: 12.34-20.95), and 0.877 (CI: 0.84-0.90), respectively. We conducted a subgroup analysis of diagnostic values, which revealed that serum type, U6 reference gene, SYBR mastermix, and East Asian Countries (China and Japan) had better diagnostic value. Conclusion Circulating miRs can serve as diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer. However, specific miRNAs still need to be discovered in diagnosing gastric cancer, especially early screening.
AB - Background Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are now used as non-invasive diagnostic indicators in various malignancies. Objective Our objective is to use a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs in gastric cancer. Methods We reviewed databases and methodically obtained papers for analysis until October 15th, 2021. The random-effect meta-analysis was performed to construct pooled diagnostic parameters. To detect the causes of heterogeneity, spearman threshold effect analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. The I-2 and Chi-square tests were also used to examine the heterogeneity. The subgroup analyses were conducted based on sample types (serum/plasma/blood), normalized genes (U6, miR-16, and miR-39), qPCR mastermix (SYBR and Taqman), and country. Finally, the publication bias was estimated using Egger's funnel plot asymmetry test. Results A total of 40 articles covering 73 studies (59 microRNAs) were included, containing 11,022 participants (6,324 cases and 4,698 controls). The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.74-0.77), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78-0.80), 4.081 (95% CI: 3.43-4.85), 0.28 (95% CI: 0.25-0.32), 16.08 (95% CI: 12.34-20.95), and 0.877 (CI: 0.84-0.90), respectively. We conducted a subgroup analysis of diagnostic values, which revealed that serum type, U6 reference gene, SYBR mastermix, and East Asian Countries (China and Japan) had better diagnostic value. Conclusion Circulating miRs can serve as diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer. However, specific miRNAs still need to be discovered in diagnosing gastric cancer, especially early screening.
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - Biomarker
KW - circulating miRNAs
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Non-invasive diagnostic indicators
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=uwapure5-25&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000942948600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.2174/0929867330666221121155905
DO - 10.2174/0929867330666221121155905
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36411580
SN - 0929-8673
VL - 30
SP - 3798
EP - 3814
JO - Current Medicinal Chemistry
JF - Current Medicinal Chemistry
IS - 33
ER -