Further work on the shaping of cortical development and function by synchrony and metabolic competition

James J. Wright, Paul Bourke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper furthers our attempts to resolve two major controversies – whether gamma synchrony plays a role in cognition, and whether cortical columns are functionally important. We have previously argued that the configuration of cortical cells that emerges in development is that which maximizes the magnitude of synchronous oscillation and minimizes metabolic cost. Here we analyse the separate effects in development of minimization of axonal lengths, and of early Hebbian learning and selective distribution of resources to growing synapses, by showing in simulations that these effects are partially antagonistic, but their interaction during development produces accurate anatomical and functional properties for both columnar and non-columnar cortex. The resulting embryonic anatomical order can provide a cortex-wide scaffold for postnatal learning that is dimensionally consistent with the representation of moving sensory objects, and, as learning progressively overwrites the embryonic order, further associations also occur in a dimensionally consistent framework. The role ascribed to cortical synchrony does not demand specific frequency, amplitude or phase variation of pulses to mediate “feature linking”. Instead, the concerted interactions of pulse synchrony with short-term synaptic dynamics and synaptic resource competition can further explain cortical information processing in analogy to Hopfield networks and quantum computation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number127
JournalFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Volume10
Issue numberDEC
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Further work on the shaping of cortical development and function by synchrony and metabolic competition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this