Further examination of the reducing transition rate in ultra high risk for psychosis samples: The possible role of earlier intervention

B. Nelson, H.P. Yuen, Ashleigh Lin, S.J. Wood, P.D. Mcgorry, J.A. Hartmann, A.R. Yung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
170 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
Background: The rate of transition to psychotic disorder in ultra high risk (UHR) patients has declined in recent cohorts. The reasons for this are unclear, but may include a lead-time bias, earlier intervention, a change in clinical characteristics of cohorts, and treatment changes. Aims: In this paper we examined the two possibilities related to reduction in duration of symptoms prior to clinic entry, i.e., lead-time bias and earlier intervention. Method: The sample consisted of all UHR research participants seen at the PACE clinic, Melbourne between 1993 and 2006 (N = 416), followed for a mean of 7.5 years (the 'PACE 400' cohort). Duration of symptoms was analysed by four baseline year time periods. Analysis of transition rate by duration of symptoms was restricted to more homogenous sub-samples (pre-1998 and pre-2001) in order to minimize confounding effects of change in patient characteristics or treatments. These cohorts were divided into those with a short and long duration of symptoms using a cut-point approach. Results: Duration of symptoms prior to entry did not reduce significantly between 1993 and 2006 (p = 0.10). The group with a short duration of symptoms showed lower transition rates and did not catch up in transition rate compared to the long duration of symptoms group. Discussion: These data suggest that, while earlier intervention or lead-time bias do not fully account for the declining transition rate in UHR cohorts, it appears that earlier intervention may have exerted a stronger influence on this decline than length of follow-up period (lead-time bias).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-49
Number of pages7
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume174
Issue number1-3
Early online date9 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
Therapeutics
Research

Cite this

Nelson, B. ; Yuen, H.P. ; Lin, Ashleigh ; Wood, S.J. ; Mcgorry, P.D. ; Hartmann, J.A. ; Yung, A.R. / Further examination of the reducing transition rate in ultra high risk for psychosis samples: The possible role of earlier intervention. In: Schizophrenia Research. 2016 ; Vol. 174, No. 1-3. pp. 43-49.
@article{6da2280077f2474688e8c6b727219b81,
title = "Further examination of the reducing transition rate in ultra high risk for psychosis samples: The possible role of earlier intervention",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 Elsevier B.V.Background: The rate of transition to psychotic disorder in ultra high risk (UHR) patients has declined in recent cohorts. The reasons for this are unclear, but may include a lead-time bias, earlier intervention, a change in clinical characteristics of cohorts, and treatment changes. Aims: In this paper we examined the two possibilities related to reduction in duration of symptoms prior to clinic entry, i.e., lead-time bias and earlier intervention. Method: The sample consisted of all UHR research participants seen at the PACE clinic, Melbourne between 1993 and 2006 (N = 416), followed for a mean of 7.5 years (the 'PACE 400' cohort). Duration of symptoms was analysed by four baseline year time periods. Analysis of transition rate by duration of symptoms was restricted to more homogenous sub-samples (pre-1998 and pre-2001) in order to minimize confounding effects of change in patient characteristics or treatments. These cohorts were divided into those with a short and long duration of symptoms using a cut-point approach. Results: Duration of symptoms prior to entry did not reduce significantly between 1993 and 2006 (p = 0.10). The group with a short duration of symptoms showed lower transition rates and did not catch up in transition rate compared to the long duration of symptoms group. Discussion: These data suggest that, while earlier intervention or lead-time bias do not fully account for the declining transition rate in UHR cohorts, it appears that earlier intervention may have exerted a stronger influence on this decline than length of follow-up period (lead-time bias).",
author = "B. Nelson and H.P. Yuen and Ashleigh Lin and S.J. Wood and P.D. Mcgorry and J.A. Hartmann and A.R. Yung",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.040",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
pages = "43--49",
journal = "Schizophrenia Research",
issn = "0920-9964",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "1-3",

}

Further examination of the reducing transition rate in ultra high risk for psychosis samples: The possible role of earlier intervention. / Nelson, B.; Yuen, H.P.; Lin, Ashleigh; Wood, S.J.; Mcgorry, P.D.; Hartmann, J.A.; Yung, A.R.

In: Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 174, No. 1-3, 07.2016, p. 43-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further examination of the reducing transition rate in ultra high risk for psychosis samples: The possible role of earlier intervention

AU - Nelson, B.

AU - Yuen, H.P.

AU - Lin, Ashleigh

AU - Wood, S.J.

AU - Mcgorry, P.D.

AU - Hartmann, J.A.

AU - Yung, A.R.

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - © 2016 Elsevier B.V.Background: The rate of transition to psychotic disorder in ultra high risk (UHR) patients has declined in recent cohorts. The reasons for this are unclear, but may include a lead-time bias, earlier intervention, a change in clinical characteristics of cohorts, and treatment changes. Aims: In this paper we examined the two possibilities related to reduction in duration of symptoms prior to clinic entry, i.e., lead-time bias and earlier intervention. Method: The sample consisted of all UHR research participants seen at the PACE clinic, Melbourne between 1993 and 2006 (N = 416), followed for a mean of 7.5 years (the 'PACE 400' cohort). Duration of symptoms was analysed by four baseline year time periods. Analysis of transition rate by duration of symptoms was restricted to more homogenous sub-samples (pre-1998 and pre-2001) in order to minimize confounding effects of change in patient characteristics or treatments. These cohorts were divided into those with a short and long duration of symptoms using a cut-point approach. Results: Duration of symptoms prior to entry did not reduce significantly between 1993 and 2006 (p = 0.10). The group with a short duration of symptoms showed lower transition rates and did not catch up in transition rate compared to the long duration of symptoms group. Discussion: These data suggest that, while earlier intervention or lead-time bias do not fully account for the declining transition rate in UHR cohorts, it appears that earlier intervention may have exerted a stronger influence on this decline than length of follow-up period (lead-time bias).

AB - © 2016 Elsevier B.V.Background: The rate of transition to psychotic disorder in ultra high risk (UHR) patients has declined in recent cohorts. The reasons for this are unclear, but may include a lead-time bias, earlier intervention, a change in clinical characteristics of cohorts, and treatment changes. Aims: In this paper we examined the two possibilities related to reduction in duration of symptoms prior to clinic entry, i.e., lead-time bias and earlier intervention. Method: The sample consisted of all UHR research participants seen at the PACE clinic, Melbourne between 1993 and 2006 (N = 416), followed for a mean of 7.5 years (the 'PACE 400' cohort). Duration of symptoms was analysed by four baseline year time periods. Analysis of transition rate by duration of symptoms was restricted to more homogenous sub-samples (pre-1998 and pre-2001) in order to minimize confounding effects of change in patient characteristics or treatments. These cohorts were divided into those with a short and long duration of symptoms using a cut-point approach. Results: Duration of symptoms prior to entry did not reduce significantly between 1993 and 2006 (p = 0.10). The group with a short duration of symptoms showed lower transition rates and did not catch up in transition rate compared to the long duration of symptoms group. Discussion: These data suggest that, while earlier intervention or lead-time bias do not fully account for the declining transition rate in UHR cohorts, it appears that earlier intervention may have exerted a stronger influence on this decline than length of follow-up period (lead-time bias).

U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.040

DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.040

M3 - Article

VL - 174

SP - 43

EP - 49

JO - Schizophrenia Research

JF - Schizophrenia Research

SN - 0920-9964

IS - 1-3

ER -