Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension

Chet Robie, Stephen D. Risavy, Djurre Holtrop, Marise Ph. Born

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared the predictive validity of two types of Frame-of-Reference personality measures to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Each version of the measures used a unique response-format referred to as frequency-based estimation that allowed the behavioral consistency of responses to be gauged. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with “at school”, and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. Results showed that completely contextualized measures were the most predictively valid and, contrary to our expectations, behavioral consistency did not moderate the relationships. Face validity and to a lesser extent perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. We discuss the implications of our results for personality assessment in applied settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-65
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Research in Personality
Volume70
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Personality
Personality Assessment
Reproducibility of Results

Cite this

@article{f1f2c11123d3407c8c16adfef412f779,
title = "Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension",
abstract = "We compared the predictive validity of two types of Frame-of-Reference personality measures to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Each version of the measures used a unique response-format referred to as frequency-based estimation that allowed the behavioral consistency of responses to be gauged. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with “at school”, and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. Results showed that completely contextualized measures were the most predictively valid and, contrary to our expectations, behavioral consistency did not moderate the relationships. Face validity and to a lesser extent perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. We discuss the implications of our results for personality assessment in applied settings.",
keywords = "Contextualization, Frame-of-reference, Frequency-based estimation, Personality assessment",
author = "Chet Robie and Risavy, {Stephen D.} and Djurre Holtrop and Born, {Marise Ph.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrp.2017.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "56--65",
journal = "Journal of Research in Personality",
issn = "0092-6566",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement : A replication and extension. / Robie, Chet; Risavy, Stephen D.; Holtrop, Djurre; Born, Marise Ph.

In: Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 70, 01.10.2017, p. 56-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement

T2 - A replication and extension

AU - Robie, Chet

AU - Risavy, Stephen D.

AU - Holtrop, Djurre

AU - Born, Marise Ph.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - We compared the predictive validity of two types of Frame-of-Reference personality measures to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Each version of the measures used a unique response-format referred to as frequency-based estimation that allowed the behavioral consistency of responses to be gauged. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with “at school”, and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. Results showed that completely contextualized measures were the most predictively valid and, contrary to our expectations, behavioral consistency did not moderate the relationships. Face validity and to a lesser extent perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. We discuss the implications of our results for personality assessment in applied settings.

AB - We compared the predictive validity of two types of Frame-of-Reference personality measures to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Each version of the measures used a unique response-format referred to as frequency-based estimation that allowed the behavioral consistency of responses to be gauged. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with “at school”, and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. Results showed that completely contextualized measures were the most predictively valid and, contrary to our expectations, behavioral consistency did not moderate the relationships. Face validity and to a lesser extent perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. We discuss the implications of our results for personality assessment in applied settings.

KW - Contextualization

KW - Frame-of-reference

KW - Frequency-based estimation

KW - Personality assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019987288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 56

EP - 65

JO - Journal of Research in Personality

JF - Journal of Research in Personality

SN - 0092-6566

ER -