Framing asylum seekers: the uses of national and cosmopolitan identity frames in arguments about asylum seekers

Catherine Austin, Farida Fozdar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Dilemmas around how to deal with asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat have been a key driver of political and public discourse for over a decade. In 2012, an ‘Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers’ was established to provide advice to the Australian government about how to deal with the increasingly embarrassing issue of asylum seekers drowning at sea and a parliamentary stalemate on the matter. Using frame analysis to understand how national and post-national identities are being recruited in this debate, this paper analyses submissions to the Panel. We demonstrate how arguments for and against asylum seekers are constructed around nationalism, regionalism and globalism (cosmopolitan). Australia was variously framed as having an alternative national character from that promoted by politicians, as having a key regional role, and hence identity, and as a global citizen (both in reality and in appearance). Contrary to expectations, we found that each frame served as a vehicle through which progressive arguments were articulated, indicating the utility of each in arguing for more humane treatment of ‘Others’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalIdentities
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

asylum seeker
regionalism
national identity
nationalism
politician
driver
expert
citizen
Asylum Seekers
discourse

Cite this

@article{7258a0c179b649fbbfe2899715da82d1,
title = "Framing asylum seekers: the uses of national and cosmopolitan identity frames in arguments about asylum seekers",
abstract = "Dilemmas around how to deal with asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat have been a key driver of political and public discourse for over a decade. In 2012, an ‘Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers’ was established to provide advice to the Australian government about how to deal with the increasingly embarrassing issue of asylum seekers drowning at sea and a parliamentary stalemate on the matter. Using frame analysis to understand how national and post-national identities are being recruited in this debate, this paper analyses submissions to the Panel. We demonstrate how arguments for and against asylum seekers are constructed around nationalism, regionalism and globalism (cosmopolitan). Australia was variously framed as having an alternative national character from that promoted by politicians, as having a key regional role, and hence identity, and as a global citizen (both in reality and in appearance). Contrary to expectations, we found that each frame served as a vehicle through which progressive arguments were articulated, indicating the utility of each in arguing for more humane treatment of ‘Others’.",
keywords = "Asylum seekers, Australia, cosmopolitan identity, frame analysis, national identity",
author = "Catherine Austin and Farida Fozdar",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/1070289X.2016.1214134",
language = "English",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "IDENTITIES-GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER",
issn = "1070-289X",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Framing asylum seekers : the uses of national and cosmopolitan identity frames in arguments about asylum seekers. / Austin, Catherine; Fozdar, Farida.

In: Identities, 05.08.2016, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing asylum seekers

T2 - the uses of national and cosmopolitan identity frames in arguments about asylum seekers

AU - Austin, Catherine

AU - Fozdar, Farida

PY - 2016/8/5

Y1 - 2016/8/5

N2 - Dilemmas around how to deal with asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat have been a key driver of political and public discourse for over a decade. In 2012, an ‘Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers’ was established to provide advice to the Australian government about how to deal with the increasingly embarrassing issue of asylum seekers drowning at sea and a parliamentary stalemate on the matter. Using frame analysis to understand how national and post-national identities are being recruited in this debate, this paper analyses submissions to the Panel. We demonstrate how arguments for and against asylum seekers are constructed around nationalism, regionalism and globalism (cosmopolitan). Australia was variously framed as having an alternative national character from that promoted by politicians, as having a key regional role, and hence identity, and as a global citizen (both in reality and in appearance). Contrary to expectations, we found that each frame served as a vehicle through which progressive arguments were articulated, indicating the utility of each in arguing for more humane treatment of ‘Others’.

AB - Dilemmas around how to deal with asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat have been a key driver of political and public discourse for over a decade. In 2012, an ‘Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers’ was established to provide advice to the Australian government about how to deal with the increasingly embarrassing issue of asylum seekers drowning at sea and a parliamentary stalemate on the matter. Using frame analysis to understand how national and post-national identities are being recruited in this debate, this paper analyses submissions to the Panel. We demonstrate how arguments for and against asylum seekers are constructed around nationalism, regionalism and globalism (cosmopolitan). Australia was variously framed as having an alternative national character from that promoted by politicians, as having a key regional role, and hence identity, and as a global citizen (both in reality and in appearance). Contrary to expectations, we found that each frame served as a vehicle through which progressive arguments were articulated, indicating the utility of each in arguing for more humane treatment of ‘Others’.

KW - Asylum seekers

KW - Australia

KW - cosmopolitan identity

KW - frame analysis

KW - national identity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982843892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1070289X.2016.1214134

DO - 10.1080/1070289X.2016.1214134

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - IDENTITIES-GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER

JF - IDENTITIES-GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER

SN - 1070-289X

ER -