Abstract
Pollution from agricultural fires is a global health issue that is particularly challenging where smallholders depend on burnings for subsistence. In Acre state, Western Amazon, a partial ban on fire, enforced with fines, is coupled with subsidized tractors. To evaluate this policy, a discrete choice experiment and contingent valuation were merged into a novel statistical variant of the Hicks-Kaldor test that is robust to preference heterogeneity. Among 27 ways to extend the ban, 5 could improve both respiratory health and smallholders' welfare, when compensated with tractors that are available for longer hours and at the right time of the year.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 409-434 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Land Economics |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fire, Tractors, and Health in the Amazon: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fire Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver