Feedback between sediment and light for seagrass: Where is it important?

Matthew P. Adams, Renae K. Hovey, Matthew R. Hipsey, Louise C. Bruce, Marco Ghisalberti, Ryan J. Lowe, Renee K. Gruber, Leonardo Ruiz-Montoya, Paul S. Maxwell, David P. Callaghan, Gary A. Kendrick, Katherine R. O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A feedback between seagrass presence, suspended sediment and benthic light can induce bistability between two ecosystem states: one where the presence of seagrass reduces suspended sediment concentrations to increase benthic light availability thereby favoring growth, and another where seagrass absence increases turbidity thereby reducing growth. This literature review identifies (1) how the environmental and seagrass meadow characteristics influence the strength and direction (stabilizing or destabilizing) of the seagrass-sediment-light feedback, and (2) how this feedback has been incorporated in ecosystem models proposed to support environmental decision making. Large, dense seagrass meadows in shallow subtidal, non-eutrophic systems, growing in sediments of mixed grain size and subject to higher velocity flows, have the greatest potential to generate bistability via the seagrass-sediment-light feedback. Conversely, seagrass meadows of low density, area and height can enhance turbulent flows that interact with the seabed, causing water clarity to decline. Using a published field experiment as a case study, we show that the seagrass-sediment-light feedback can induce bistability only if the suspended sediment has sufficient light attenuation properties. The seagrass-sediment-light feedback has been considered in very few ecosystem models. These models have the potential to identify areas where bistability occurs, which is information that can assist in spatial prioritization of conservation and restoration efforts. In areas where seagrass is present and bistability is predicted, recovery may be difficult once this seagrass is lost. Conversely, bare areas where seagrass presence is predicted (without bistability) may be better targets for seagrass restoration than bare areas where bistability is predicted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1937-1955
Number of pages19
JournalLimnology and Oceanography
Volume61
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

seagrass
sediments
sediment
meadows
seagrass meadow
suspended sediment
ecosystems
turbulent flow
prioritization
ecosystem
strength (mechanics)
turbidity
decision making
light attenuation
water quality
light availability
case studies
literature review
flow velocity
grain size

Cite this

Adams, Matthew P. ; Hovey, Renae K. ; Hipsey, Matthew R. ; Bruce, Louise C. ; Ghisalberti, Marco ; Lowe, Ryan J. ; Gruber, Renee K. ; Ruiz-Montoya, Leonardo ; Maxwell, Paul S. ; Callaghan, David P. ; Kendrick, Gary A. ; O'Brien, Katherine R. / Feedback between sediment and light for seagrass : Where is it important?. In: Limnology and Oceanography. 2016 ; Vol. 61, No. 6. pp. 1937-1955.
@article{c841fc1615a845c29aa4386cd7ad1354,
title = "Feedback between sediment and light for seagrass: Where is it important?",
abstract = "A feedback between seagrass presence, suspended sediment and benthic light can induce bistability between two ecosystem states: one where the presence of seagrass reduces suspended sediment concentrations to increase benthic light availability thereby favoring growth, and another where seagrass absence increases turbidity thereby reducing growth. This literature review identifies (1) how the environmental and seagrass meadow characteristics influence the strength and direction (stabilizing or destabilizing) of the seagrass-sediment-light feedback, and (2) how this feedback has been incorporated in ecosystem models proposed to support environmental decision making. Large, dense seagrass meadows in shallow subtidal, non-eutrophic systems, growing in sediments of mixed grain size and subject to higher velocity flows, have the greatest potential to generate bistability via the seagrass-sediment-light feedback. Conversely, seagrass meadows of low density, area and height can enhance turbulent flows that interact with the seabed, causing water clarity to decline. Using a published field experiment as a case study, we show that the seagrass-sediment-light feedback can induce bistability only if the suspended sediment has sufficient light attenuation properties. The seagrass-sediment-light feedback has been considered in very few ecosystem models. These models have the potential to identify areas where bistability occurs, which is information that can assist in spatial prioritization of conservation and restoration efforts. In areas where seagrass is present and bistability is predicted, recovery may be difficult once this seagrass is lost. Conversely, bare areas where seagrass presence is predicted (without bistability) may be better targets for seagrass restoration than bare areas where bistability is predicted.",
author = "Adams, {Matthew P.} and Hovey, {Renae K.} and Hipsey, {Matthew R.} and Bruce, {Louise C.} and Marco Ghisalberti and Lowe, {Ryan J.} and Gruber, {Renee K.} and Leonardo Ruiz-Montoya and Maxwell, {Paul S.} and Callaghan, {David P.} and Kendrick, {Gary A.} and O'Brien, {Katherine R.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lno.10319",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "1937--1955",
journal = "Limnology and Oceanography",
issn = "0024-3590",
publisher = "American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Feedback between sediment and light for seagrass : Where is it important? / Adams, Matthew P.; Hovey, Renae K.; Hipsey, Matthew R.; Bruce, Louise C.; Ghisalberti, Marco; Lowe, Ryan J.; Gruber, Renee K.; Ruiz-Montoya, Leonardo; Maxwell, Paul S.; Callaghan, David P.; Kendrick, Gary A.; O'Brien, Katherine R.

In: Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 61, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 1937-1955.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feedback between sediment and light for seagrass

T2 - Where is it important?

AU - Adams, Matthew P.

AU - Hovey, Renae K.

AU - Hipsey, Matthew R.

AU - Bruce, Louise C.

AU - Ghisalberti, Marco

AU - Lowe, Ryan J.

AU - Gruber, Renee K.

AU - Ruiz-Montoya, Leonardo

AU - Maxwell, Paul S.

AU - Callaghan, David P.

AU - Kendrick, Gary A.

AU - O'Brien, Katherine R.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - A feedback between seagrass presence, suspended sediment and benthic light can induce bistability between two ecosystem states: one where the presence of seagrass reduces suspended sediment concentrations to increase benthic light availability thereby favoring growth, and another where seagrass absence increases turbidity thereby reducing growth. This literature review identifies (1) how the environmental and seagrass meadow characteristics influence the strength and direction (stabilizing or destabilizing) of the seagrass-sediment-light feedback, and (2) how this feedback has been incorporated in ecosystem models proposed to support environmental decision making. Large, dense seagrass meadows in shallow subtidal, non-eutrophic systems, growing in sediments of mixed grain size and subject to higher velocity flows, have the greatest potential to generate bistability via the seagrass-sediment-light feedback. Conversely, seagrass meadows of low density, area and height can enhance turbulent flows that interact with the seabed, causing water clarity to decline. Using a published field experiment as a case study, we show that the seagrass-sediment-light feedback can induce bistability only if the suspended sediment has sufficient light attenuation properties. The seagrass-sediment-light feedback has been considered in very few ecosystem models. These models have the potential to identify areas where bistability occurs, which is information that can assist in spatial prioritization of conservation and restoration efforts. In areas where seagrass is present and bistability is predicted, recovery may be difficult once this seagrass is lost. Conversely, bare areas where seagrass presence is predicted (without bistability) may be better targets for seagrass restoration than bare areas where bistability is predicted.

AB - A feedback between seagrass presence, suspended sediment and benthic light can induce bistability between two ecosystem states: one where the presence of seagrass reduces suspended sediment concentrations to increase benthic light availability thereby favoring growth, and another where seagrass absence increases turbidity thereby reducing growth. This literature review identifies (1) how the environmental and seagrass meadow characteristics influence the strength and direction (stabilizing or destabilizing) of the seagrass-sediment-light feedback, and (2) how this feedback has been incorporated in ecosystem models proposed to support environmental decision making. Large, dense seagrass meadows in shallow subtidal, non-eutrophic systems, growing in sediments of mixed grain size and subject to higher velocity flows, have the greatest potential to generate bistability via the seagrass-sediment-light feedback. Conversely, seagrass meadows of low density, area and height can enhance turbulent flows that interact with the seabed, causing water clarity to decline. Using a published field experiment as a case study, we show that the seagrass-sediment-light feedback can induce bistability only if the suspended sediment has sufficient light attenuation properties. The seagrass-sediment-light feedback has been considered in very few ecosystem models. These models have the potential to identify areas where bistability occurs, which is information that can assist in spatial prioritization of conservation and restoration efforts. In areas where seagrass is present and bistability is predicted, recovery may be difficult once this seagrass is lost. Conversely, bare areas where seagrass presence is predicted (without bistability) may be better targets for seagrass restoration than bare areas where bistability is predicted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977117549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lno.10319

DO - 10.1002/lno.10319

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 1937

EP - 1955

JO - Limnology and Oceanography

JF - Limnology and Oceanography

SN - 0024-3590

IS - 6

ER -