Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator

L. M. Al-Saud, F. Mushtaq, M. J. Allsop, P. C. Culmer, I. Mirghani, E. Yates, A. Keeling, M. A. Mon-Williams, M. Manogue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effect of qualitatively different types of pedagogical feedback (FB) on the training, transfer and retention of basic manual dexterity dental skills using a virtual reality (VR) haptic dental simulator. Methods: Sixty-three participants (M = 22.7 years; SD = 3.4 years), with no previous dental training, were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 21 each). Group 1 received device-only feedback during the training phase, that is the visual display of the simulator (DFB); Group 2 received verbal feedback from a qualified dental instructor (IFB); and Group 3 received a combination of instructor and device feedback (IDFB). Participants completed four tasks during which feedback was given according to group allocation as well as two skills transfer tests. Skill retention was examined immediately after training, at 1 week and at 1 month post-test. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in overall performance (P < 0.001) and error (P = 0.006). Post hoc comparisons revealed the IDFB group produced substantially better performance and fewer errors in comparison with DFB and IFB training. This difference translated to improved performance in skill retention and generalisation of knowledge to novel tasks. Conclusion: These data indicate that the acquisition and retention of basic dental motor skills in novice trainees is best optimised through a combination of instructor and visual display (VR)-driven feedback. The results have implications for the utility and implementation of VR haptic technology in dental education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)240-247
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Dental Education
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Motor Skills
Tooth
instructor
virtual reality
Group
Equipment and Supplies
performance
Dental Education
trainee
Technology
Retention (Psychology)

Cite this

Al-Saud, L. M., Mushtaq, F., Allsop, M. J., Culmer, P. C., Mirghani, I., Yates, E., ... Manogue, M. (2017). Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator. European Journal of Dental Education, 21(4), 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12214
Al-Saud, L. M. ; Mushtaq, F. ; Allsop, M. J. ; Culmer, P. C. ; Mirghani, I. ; Yates, E. ; Keeling, A. ; Mon-Williams, M. A. ; Manogue, M. / Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator. In: European Journal of Dental Education. 2017 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 240-247.
@article{c773b46e0ecd4346b6ffd24d63712fc6,
title = "Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator",
abstract = "Aim: To investigate the effect of qualitatively different types of pedagogical feedback (FB) on the training, transfer and retention of basic manual dexterity dental skills using a virtual reality (VR) haptic dental simulator. Methods: Sixty-three participants (M = 22.7 years; SD = 3.4 years), with no previous dental training, were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 21 each). Group 1 received device-only feedback during the training phase, that is the visual display of the simulator (DFB); Group 2 received verbal feedback from a qualified dental instructor (IFB); and Group 3 received a combination of instructor and device feedback (IDFB). Participants completed four tasks during which feedback was given according to group allocation as well as two skills transfer tests. Skill retention was examined immediately after training, at 1 week and at 1 month post-test. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in overall performance (P < 0.001) and error (P = 0.006). Post hoc comparisons revealed the IDFB group produced substantially better performance and fewer errors in comparison with DFB and IFB training. This difference translated to improved performance in skill retention and generalisation of knowledge to novel tasks. Conclusion: These data indicate that the acquisition and retention of basic dental motor skills in novice trainees is best optimised through a combination of instructor and visual display (VR)-driven feedback. The results have implications for the utility and implementation of VR haptic technology in dental education.",
keywords = "dentistry, feedback, motor learning, skill acquisition, undergraduate dental education, virtual reality",
author = "Al-Saud, {L. M.} and F. Mushtaq and Allsop, {M. J.} and Culmer, {P. C.} and I. Mirghani and E. Yates and A. Keeling and Mon-Williams, {M. A.} and M. Manogue",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/eje.12214",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "240--247",
journal = "European Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "1396-5883",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "4",

}

Al-Saud, LM, Mushtaq, F, Allsop, MJ, Culmer, PC, Mirghani, I, Yates, E, Keeling, A, Mon-Williams, MA & Manogue, M 2017, 'Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator' European Journal of Dental Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12214

Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator. / Al-Saud, L. M.; Mushtaq, F.; Allsop, M. J.; Culmer, P. C.; Mirghani, I.; Yates, E.; Keeling, A.; Mon-Williams, M. A.; Manogue, M.

In: European Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.11.2017, p. 240-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator

AU - Al-Saud, L. M.

AU - Mushtaq, F.

AU - Allsop, M. J.

AU - Culmer, P. C.

AU - Mirghani, I.

AU - Yates, E.

AU - Keeling, A.

AU - Mon-Williams, M. A.

AU - Manogue, M.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Aim: To investigate the effect of qualitatively different types of pedagogical feedback (FB) on the training, transfer and retention of basic manual dexterity dental skills using a virtual reality (VR) haptic dental simulator. Methods: Sixty-three participants (M = 22.7 years; SD = 3.4 years), with no previous dental training, were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 21 each). Group 1 received device-only feedback during the training phase, that is the visual display of the simulator (DFB); Group 2 received verbal feedback from a qualified dental instructor (IFB); and Group 3 received a combination of instructor and device feedback (IDFB). Participants completed four tasks during which feedback was given according to group allocation as well as two skills transfer tests. Skill retention was examined immediately after training, at 1 week and at 1 month post-test. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in overall performance (P < 0.001) and error (P = 0.006). Post hoc comparisons revealed the IDFB group produced substantially better performance and fewer errors in comparison with DFB and IFB training. This difference translated to improved performance in skill retention and generalisation of knowledge to novel tasks. Conclusion: These data indicate that the acquisition and retention of basic dental motor skills in novice trainees is best optimised through a combination of instructor and visual display (VR)-driven feedback. The results have implications for the utility and implementation of VR haptic technology in dental education.

AB - Aim: To investigate the effect of qualitatively different types of pedagogical feedback (FB) on the training, transfer and retention of basic manual dexterity dental skills using a virtual reality (VR) haptic dental simulator. Methods: Sixty-three participants (M = 22.7 years; SD = 3.4 years), with no previous dental training, were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 21 each). Group 1 received device-only feedback during the training phase, that is the visual display of the simulator (DFB); Group 2 received verbal feedback from a qualified dental instructor (IFB); and Group 3 received a combination of instructor and device feedback (IDFB). Participants completed four tasks during which feedback was given according to group allocation as well as two skills transfer tests. Skill retention was examined immediately after training, at 1 week and at 1 month post-test. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the groups in overall performance (P < 0.001) and error (P = 0.006). Post hoc comparisons revealed the IDFB group produced substantially better performance and fewer errors in comparison with DFB and IFB training. This difference translated to improved performance in skill retention and generalisation of knowledge to novel tasks. Conclusion: These data indicate that the acquisition and retention of basic dental motor skills in novice trainees is best optimised through a combination of instructor and visual display (VR)-driven feedback. The results have implications for the utility and implementation of VR haptic technology in dental education.

KW - dentistry

KW - feedback

KW - motor learning

KW - skill acquisition

KW - undergraduate dental education

KW - virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993660524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/eje.12214

DO - 10.1111/eje.12214

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 240

EP - 247

JO - European Journal of Dental Education

JF - European Journal of Dental Education

SN - 1396-5883

IS - 4

ER -